2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2801687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale vulnerability of complex networks

Abstract: We present a novel approach to quantify the vulnerability of a complex network, i.e., the capacity of a graph to maintain its functional performance under random damages or malicious attacks. The proposed measure represents a multiscale evaluation of vulnerability, and makes use of combined powers of the links' betweenness. We show that the proposed approach is able to properly describe some cases for which earlier measures of vulnerability fail. The relevant applications of our method for technological networ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of the present study is to analyze the vulnerability of AARNs to errors (i.e., the random isolation of an airport) and attacks (i.e., isolation of well-connected airports with the aim of causing the maximum damage to the route network). This assessment is performed by two di↵erent approaches: first, using a multi-scale measure of vulnerability (Boccaletti et al, 2007), and second, examining the e↵ect of the disconnection of a fraction f of wellconnected nodes on the size of the overall giant component. This study can shed light on the robustness of real networks not only for the special case of airline alliances but also for networks sharing similar topological properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the present study is to analyze the vulnerability of AARNs to errors (i.e., the random isolation of an airport) and attacks (i.e., isolation of well-connected airports with the aim of causing the maximum damage to the route network). This assessment is performed by two di↵erent approaches: first, using a multi-scale measure of vulnerability (Boccaletti et al, 2007), and second, examining the e↵ect of the disconnection of a fraction f of wellconnected nodes on the size of the overall giant component. This study can shed light on the robustness of real networks not only for the special case of airline alliances but also for networks sharing similar topological properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of links decreases, the network becomes increasingly fragile and b 2 > 1. Reducing N l to a great extent leads to an inexpensive, but very fragile structure (b 2 1 [113,114]). Thus, the decrease of the number of links and the increase of the robustness have opposite tendencies.…”
Section: Proposed Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where b p l is the betweenness centrality of link l. The multi-scale vulnerability b p of a graph G measures the distribution of shortest paths when links are failing (or attacked) [114] and is very useful when comparing the vulnerability of networks because it helps distinguish between non-identical although very similar network topologies [113]. As shown in [114], if we want to distinguish between two networks with graphs G and G * , one first computes…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations