2017
DOI: 10.1175/waf-d-16-0122.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale Upstream and In Situ Precursors to the Elevated Mixed Layer and High-Impact Weather over the Midwest United States

Abstract: Two severe MCSs over the upper Midwest United States resulted in .100 mm of rain in a ;24-h period and .200 severe weather reports, respectively, during 30 June-2 July 2011. This period also featured 100 (104) daily maximum high (low) temperature records across the same region. These high-impact weather events occurred in the presence of an elevated mixed layer (EML) that influenced the development of the severe MCSs and the numerous record high temperatures. The antecedent large-scale flow evolution was influ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The base is considered the first pressure level, from bottom to top, to have g greater than or equal to 7.5 K km 21 . This g threshold is lower than that used in other research [BE10 and Cordeira et al (2017) used 8.0 K km 21 ] because the CFSR has less steep g in the EML than observed soundings (Table 1). An analysis of different thresholds was conducted, and a g of 7.5 K km 21 in the CFSR soundings was in good agreement with EMLs in observed soundings (Fig.…”
Section: B Definition Of Elevated Mixed Layermentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The base is considered the first pressure level, from bottom to top, to have g greater than or equal to 7.5 K km 21 . This g threshold is lower than that used in other research [BE10 and Cordeira et al (2017) used 8.0 K km 21 ] because the CFSR has less steep g in the EML than observed soundings (Table 1). An analysis of different thresholds was conducted, and a g of 7.5 K km 21 in the CFSR soundings was in good agreement with EMLs in observed soundings (Fig.…”
Section: B Definition Of Elevated Mixed Layermentioning
confidence: 61%
“…2). A threshold of 150 hPa for EML thickness was used by Cordeira et al (2017) and is less restrictive than the other thresholds tested (between 150 and 250 hPa). The mean EML thicknesses, shown in section 3a, are generally greater than 200 hPa, so 150 hPa is a suitable EML thickness threshold.…”
Section: B Definition Of Elevated Mixed Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations