2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale simulation of water flow through laboratory-scale nanotube membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant discrepancy can be seen between the enhancement factors quoted by Du et al [12] (light green square) and Zhang et al [38] (red square) for the 10 nm diameter experiments. It has been suggested that the extremely large enhancement values reported by Majumder et al (dark green squares) and Du et al (light green squares) represent an over-estimation [39] and could be the result of an uncontrolled external variable such as an electric field [40]. In general, experiments involving flow through CNT membranes are prone to showing errors due to practical challenges in 4 as blue filled circles joined by straight line segments.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant discrepancy can be seen between the enhancement factors quoted by Du et al [12] (light green square) and Zhang et al [38] (red square) for the 10 nm diameter experiments. It has been suggested that the extremely large enhancement values reported by Majumder et al (dark green squares) and Du et al (light green squares) represent an over-estimation [39] and could be the result of an uncontrolled external variable such as an electric field [40]. In general, experiments involving flow through CNT membranes are prone to showing errors due to practical challenges in 4 as blue filled circles joined by straight line segments.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error bars represent the standard deviation of three membranes. d) Pure water enhancement factors in CNTs from literature experiments (data points) [3,15,21,[38][39][40] and simulations (lines) [11,13,[41][42][43] compared to our results for a 60 cm 2 SWCNT membrane. Error bar for this work represents the standard deviation of four membranes (both small and large) and is smaller than the data point.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/advs202001670mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…where J int is calculated empirically from dV dt as was described above, while J PTP k × ΔP, and k is the parameter defined by the geometry of the pore (Borg et al, 2018). J PTP is proportional to ΔP that is equal to the oncotic pressure.…”
Section: Calculation Of Water Flux Rates Based On Shrinkage and Estimmentioning
confidence: 99%