2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale Modelling and Analysis of Collective Decision Making in Swarm Robotics

Abstract: We present a unified approach to describing certain types of collective decision making in swarm robotics that bridges from a microscopic individual-based description to aggregate properties. Our approach encompasses robot swarm experiments, microscopic and probabilistic macroscopic-discrete simulations as well as an analytic mathematical model. Following up on previous work, we identify the symmetry parameter, a measure of the progress of the swarm towards a decision, as a fundamental integrated swarm propert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To enable swarming, it is essential to achieve distributed communication and decentralized decision-making Valentini et al, 2014Valentini et al, , 2015Valentini et al, , 2017Vigelius et al, 2014). For instance, natural swarms achieve self-organizing behaviors and decentralized decision-making by means of distributed information exchanges through local signaling (Camazine et al, 2001) associated with sometimes sophisticated signaling mechanisms and trophic interactions (Dusenbery, 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable swarming, it is essential to achieve distributed communication and decentralized decision-making Valentini et al, 2014Valentini et al, , 2015Valentini et al, , 2017Vigelius et al, 2014). For instance, natural swarms achieve self-organizing behaviors and decentralized decision-making by means of distributed information exchanges through local signaling (Camazine et al, 2001) associated with sometimes sophisticated signaling mechanisms and trophic interactions (Dusenbery, 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a very difficult task since there is no general systematic way to devise individual behaviours that reliably achieve a desired group behaviour. Thus design choices can usually only be tested in experiments or simulations [37]. …”
Section: Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a very di cult task since there is no general systematic way to devise individual behaviours that reliably achieve a desired group behaviour. Thus design choices can usually only be tested in experiments or simulations [38].…”
Section: Microscopic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, physical experiments are expensive, time-consuming and can usually only be conducted under sanitized laboratory conditions. Third, deriving macroscopic descriptions from probabilistic microscopic ones is usually hard, in particular if spatial aspects need to be taken into account [38].…”
Section: Macroscopic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%