2022
DOI: 10.3390/nano12020182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale Investigation of the Structural, Electrical and Photoluminescence Properties of MoS2 Obtained by MoO3 Sulfurization

Abstract: In this paper, we report a multiscale investigation of the compositional, morphological, structural, electrical, and optical emission properties of 2H-MoS2 obtained by sulfurization at 800 °C of very thin MoO3 films (with thickness ranging from ~2.8 nm to ~4.2 nm) on a SiO2/Si substrate. XPS analyses confirmed that the sulfurization was very effective in the reduction of the oxide to MoS2, with only a small percentage of residual MoO3 present in the final film. High-resolution TEM/STEM analyses revealed the fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main mechanism ruling the formation of MoS 2 during the sulfurization process is the heterogeneous vapor–solid reaction between S and MoO x , while the loss of MoO x by evaporation plays a not negligible role at the temperature of 700 °C. [ 34 ] According to other recent reports, [ 33,34 ] the sulfurization of ≈1 nm MoO x is expected to result in the formation of 1L MoS 2 . No reaction between Mo or S and 4H‐SiC occurs during the sulfurization process, while a slight oxidation of 4H‐SiC is observed, as indicated by Si 2p core level spectra of the as‐deposited and annealed samples (reported in Figure S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main mechanism ruling the formation of MoS 2 during the sulfurization process is the heterogeneous vapor–solid reaction between S and MoO x , while the loss of MoO x by evaporation plays a not negligible role at the temperature of 700 °C. [ 34 ] According to other recent reports, [ 33,34 ] the sulfurization of ≈1 nm MoO x is expected to result in the formation of 1L MoS 2 . No reaction between Mo or S and 4H‐SiC occurs during the sulfurization process, while a slight oxidation of 4H‐SiC is observed, as indicated by Si 2p core level spectra of the as‐deposited and annealed samples (reported in Figure S1, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In our work, highly uniform and controlled coverage of 4H‐SiC with ultrathin MoS 2 films (predominantly monolayer (1L)) was achieved by a facile synthesis method, [ 33 ] highly compatible with semiconductor fab processes, i.e., sulfurization of predeposited very‐thin (≈1.2 nm) Mo films at a temperature of 700 °C. Interestingly, current–voltage characteristics (at room temperature) of these MoS 2 heterojunctions with n + ‐doped 4H‐SiC showed a pronounced NDR, indicating the occurrence of band‐to‐band‐tunneling (BTBT) at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This induced-doping strain relation has been evidenced for other 2D materials, such as black-phosphorus (BP) [32] where strain-modulated bandgap significantly alters the density of thermally activated carriers, impacting the conductance of BP-based FETs; and in single-layer MoS 2 [33] where experimental evidence of the direct relation between strain and doping has been shown by Raman mapping and electrical measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Given that the E 2 g 1 signature mode is only active on the thickness or strain, the possibility of thickness inconsistency could be ruled out. [ 16,28,29 ] It has also been demonstrated that local strain resulting from a corrugated structure can induce significant changes to Raman and PL properties. [ 30 ] Therefore, the observed shift of mode E 2 g 1 is undoubtedly attributed to the structural change induced strain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%