2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale hierarchical analysis of rock mass and prediction of its mechanical and hydraulic properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e peak strain of the measuring points under different confining pressures in Figure 19 is fitted by (5), which reaches the conclusion that when the confining pressure is increased from 0 to 3 MPa, the physical attenuation coefficients of the cylindrical wave are 0.657, 0.601, 0.586, and 0.749, respectively. Similarly, according to the above method, the physical attenuation coefficients of cylindrical wave in the T2 test sample are 0.641, 0.623, 0.539, and 0.776, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Confining Pressurementioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e peak strain of the measuring points under different confining pressures in Figure 19 is fitted by (5), which reaches the conclusion that when the confining pressure is increased from 0 to 3 MPa, the physical attenuation coefficients of the cylindrical wave are 0.657, 0.601, 0.586, and 0.749, respectively. Similarly, according to the above method, the physical attenuation coefficients of cylindrical wave in the T2 test sample are 0.641, 0.623, 0.539, and 0.776, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Confining Pressurementioning
confidence: 72%
“…e natural rock mass contains a large number of joints which have a great impact on the mechanical properties of rock mass and the propagation of stress wave [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. At present, most of the rock mass excavation involved in underground engineering still adopts the drilling and blasting method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, during construction and operation of major engineering projects, e.g., civil engineering, mining engineering, hydraulic engineering, bridge engineering and petroleum engineering, the structures built in or on rock mass not only bear the complex in situ conditions, e.g., stress, seepage, faulting, thermal and chemical coupling, but also often encounter a variety of dynamic disturbances during engineering construction and operation periods (e.g., blasting, TBM excavation, hydraulic fracturing, geological drilling and rockburst during engineering construction, natural earthquakes, driving loads, sequential explosions or even military attacks during engineering operation), whose strain rate is over the threshold value (Meyers 1994;Zhang and Zhao 2014a). Besides, the major engineering projects after construction are no longer built in or on the natural intact surrounding rocks, but located in or on the disturbed and deteriorated rock masses (Li et al 2013a, b;Deng et al 2014;Liu et al 2018). As a result, the mechanical responses of major engineering become more complicated due to the coupled impact of the dynamic disturbances and in situ conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers considered rockburst as microseismic events that result in severe damage to rock mass structure with sudden or intensive acoustic emissions [25][26][27]. Microseismic monitoring technology has been widely used in rock mechanics and provides a feasible way to predict or prewarn rockburst [28][29][30][31]. Feng et al proposed a neural network prediction model based on the microseismic monitoring information [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%