2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale groundwater level forecasting: Coupling new machine learning approaches with wavelet transforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in introduction, the XGB model has been applied to various fields, but hardly to groundwater research. Recent studies used the XGB model to predict groundwater level [57,58], analyze groundwater salinity [59], and assess groundwater quality [60]. In these studies, the XGB model had more accurate results compared to ANN, SVM, and multiple linear regression methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in introduction, the XGB model has been applied to various fields, but hardly to groundwater research. Recent studies used the XGB model to predict groundwater level [57,58], analyze groundwater salinity [59], and assess groundwater quality [60]. In these studies, the XGB model had more accurate results compared to ANN, SVM, and multiple linear regression methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contours of the real part of the Morlet wavelet coefficients can reflect the energy intensity information at different phases and time scales. The variation process of the wavelet coefficients with time represents the evolution law of alternating high and low values of the time series at this scale (Rahman et al 2020). The positive and negative changes in contour of the real part of the coefficient represent the evolution process and abrupt characteristics of the given data in the near future: the positive value corresponds to the rise period of the sequence, the negative value corresponds to the reduction phase, and the zero value corresponds to the transition period.…”
Section: Wavelet Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the highly nonlinear, non-stationary and relatively complex hydrological system, the need of lots of hydrogeological data as well as the proper initial and boundary conditions bring plenty of difficulties in the characterization of the real hydrological system, and thus threaten the accuracy and the popularization of these models [14,15]. With the rapid growth of the data-based methods (mainly machine learning models), conventional algorithms such as the artificial neural network (ANN), the support vector machine (SVM), the extreme learning machine (ELM), the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and genetic programming (GP) have become viable techniques for groundwater forecasting owing to the greater simplicity in design and flexibility [16,17]. A comprehensive and explicit review of the machine learning application in GWL modeling can be found in Rajaee et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%