2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.165129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz for spin chains with continuously varying criticality

Abstract: We use the multiscale entanglement renormalisation ansatz (MERA) to numerically investigate three critical quantum spin chains with Z2 × Z2 on-site symmetry: a staggered XXZ model, a transverse field cluster model, and the quantum Ashkin-Teller model. All three models possess a continuous one-parameter family of critical points. Along this critical line, the thermodynamic limit of these models is expected to be described by classes of c = 1 conformal field theories (CFTs) of two possible types: the S 1 free bo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated exponent is exact at the Ising decoupling point (the point in parameter space where the AT model reduces to two uncoupled Ising models) and the relative error in this calculated exponent is comparable to the numerically-intensive MERA simulations performed in Ref. [13]. Specifically, the SRS RG gives a relative error in the prediction of < 10% in the range λ ∈ [−0.4, 0.9], and much small error for |λ| 1, compared with < 5% error in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated exponent is exact at the Ising decoupling point (the point in parameter space where the AT model reduces to two uncoupled Ising models) and the relative error in this calculated exponent is comparable to the numerically-intensive MERA simulations performed in Ref. [13]. Specifically, the SRS RG gives a relative error in the prediction of < 10% in the range λ ∈ [−0.4, 0.9], and much small error for |λ| 1, compared with < 5% error in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Specifically, the SRS RG gives a relative error in the prediction of < 10% in the range λ ∈ [−0.4, 0.9], and much small error for |λ| 1, compared with < 5% error in Ref. [13]. The accuracy decreases significantly towards the endpoints of the critical line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the low-energy description in terms of N fermions with a linear dispersion naively suggests that the corresponding critical points are described by a product theory of N Ising CFTs with c = N/2. Indeed, central charges of c = 1 and c = 3/2 have been obtained for the 3-cluster model at (J, h) = (0, ±1) [30] and (J, h) = (±1, 0) [23], respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in 1D these models are universal resources only for a single qubit, they have proven accessible settings to study the entanglement [21][22][23][25][26][27][28][29][30] and the computational power [31][32][33] of symmetry protected states, as well as the robustness of edge states in a many-body localized phase [34]. Perturbing the pure stabilizer models with Ising and Zeeman terms, we define the generalized cluster models with periodic boundary conditions by the Hamiltonians (the original 1D cluster model corresponds to A = 3)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%