IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2019
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2019.8900083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale Based Characterization and Classification of Urban Land-Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of features and their parameterization are important issues as noted in some works where certain features are shown to be better suited than others for different case studies [6], [17], [18], [38]- [42]. Another common practice is to compute local features at multiple scales or window sizes to better capture the spatial characteristics of USUs [18], [38], [40]. SVMs, classification and regression trees, and random forests have all been used to define the classifier component in these early works.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of features and their parameterization are important issues as noted in some works where certain features are shown to be better suited than others for different case studies [6], [17], [18], [38]- [42]. Another common practice is to compute local features at multiple scales or window sizes to better capture the spatial characteristics of USUs [18], [38], [40]. SVMs, classification and regression trees, and random forests have all been used to define the classifier component in these early works.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we train and test the two proposed CNN architectures and DenseNet-121 which was the overall top performing architecture from the previous experiments in Venezuela. We compare the results obtained from these architectures to a nondeep learning baseline used previously in [40]. We compare these methods for USU classification in Johannesburg, South Africa; Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Dakar, Senegal; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; and Nairobi, Kenya.…”
Section: B Comparisons To Engineered Features and Support Vector Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%