2018
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8040119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale and Hierarchical Classification for Benthic Habitat Mapping

Abstract: Developing quantitative and objective approaches to integrate multibeam echosounder (MBES) data with ground observations for predictive modelling is essential for ensuring repeatability and providing confidence measures for benthic habitat mapping. The scale of predictors within predictive models directly influences habitat distribution maps, therefore matching the scale of predictors to the scale of environmental drivers is key to improving model accuracy. This study uses a multi-scalar and hierarchical class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional techniques, such as ground, ship-borne, and airborne-based surveying provide very accurate measurements (i.e., within a few centimeters) [8]. Currently, multibeam echosounders (MBES), which were originally designed for deep water measurements, are commonly used for high resolution bathymetry retrieval in nearshore areas [11,12], including surveys in challenging tidal environments (e.g., the German Wadden Sea [13] and Venetian Lagoon [14]). Recent developments have enabled their use in up to 1 m depths with resolutions reaching 0.05 m, which can be compared to high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional techniques, such as ground, ship-borne, and airborne-based surveying provide very accurate measurements (i.e., within a few centimeters) [8]. Currently, multibeam echosounders (MBES), which were originally designed for deep water measurements, are commonly used for high resolution bathymetry retrieval in nearshore areas [11,12], including surveys in challenging tidal environments (e.g., the German Wadden Sea [13] and Venetian Lagoon [14]). Recent developments have enabled their use in up to 1 m depths with resolutions reaching 0.05 m, which can be compared to high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the applications of general geomorphometry, derivatives of slope, curvature, rugosity, and topographic position are among the most common variables calculated in studies characterising the marine environment [21]. Derivatives from bathymetric data have typically been generated based on window scales of 3 × 3 as this is typically the input grid size default setting of spatial software packages [22], however there are movements toward multiscale analysis [23,24]. This allows users to explore the function of variables at a range of fine to broad scales to determine what scales most effectively relate to the target of interest [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike in terrestrial applications of geomorphometry, for which DTMs need to be hydrologically corrected (e.g., by removing sinks), the preparation of DBMs for marine applications mainly consists in correcting errors and artefacts that could not be accounted for during the processing of raw data to generate the DBM or filling in data gaps to facilitate analyses and reduce potential edge effects. For instance, Porskamp et al [26] used Delaunay triangulation to stitch multiple datasets and fill any holes in the final product.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%