2021
DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2020.033101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscalar moral economy

Abstract: This article addresses the relevance of the moral economy concept in light of unequal socioeconomic relations between a European agribusiness and rural residents in Zambia. It argues that the moral economy concept offers a helpful heuristic device for analyzing how relationships are constituted, negotiated, and contested among interdependent actors with “opposing” socioeconomic interests. To explain the dynamics of their relationships, however, the moral economy concept has to extend beyond its usual, spatiall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They highlight the importance of taking a multi-scalar approach to moral economies, even where the ethnographic focus remains local. 69 another theme is the role of affect and emotions for the expression and (re)production of moral economies and orders, including the overt celebration and performance of corporate values, financial success, and social status (the contributions of Bolgurova and Schimpfössl). Indeed, while a moral economic approach is traditionally concerned with analysing collective ways of shaping moral ideas, the contributions highlight the way contemporary capitalism in the region supports the cultural and economic hegemony of individuality.…”
Section: Conclusion: the Moral Thickness Of Capitalist Ordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They highlight the importance of taking a multi-scalar approach to moral economies, even where the ethnographic focus remains local. 69 another theme is the role of affect and emotions for the expression and (re)production of moral economies and orders, including the overt celebration and performance of corporate values, financial success, and social status (the contributions of Bolgurova and Schimpfössl). Indeed, while a moral economic approach is traditionally concerned with analysing collective ways of shaping moral ideas, the contributions highlight the way contemporary capitalism in the region supports the cultural and economic hegemony of individuality.…”
Section: Conclusion: the Moral Thickness Of Capitalist Ordersmentioning
confidence: 99%