2012
DOI: 10.1002/fld.3646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multirate time stepping for accelerating explicit discontinuous Galerkin computations with application to geophysical flows

Abstract: SUMMARY This paper presents multirate explicit time‐stepping schemes for solving partial differential equations with discontinuous Galerkin elements in the framework of Large‐scale marine flows. It addresses the variability of the local stable time steps by gathering the mesh elements in appropriate groups. The real challenge is to develop methods exhibiting mass conservation and consistency. Two multirate approaches, based on standard explicit Runge–Kutta methods, are analyzed. They are well suited and optimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To benefit from the multi-resolution capability even in cases when only a very small portion of the computational grid points have locally increased resolutions, multirate time stepping schemes are needed. Seny et al (2013) gave an example of such schemes applied in a discontinuous Galerkin model.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To benefit from the multi-resolution capability even in cases when only a very small portion of the computational grid points have locally increased resolutions, multirate time stepping schemes are needed. Seny et al (2013) gave an example of such schemes applied in a discontinuous Galerkin model.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is well suited for advectiondominated problems (Bassi and Rebay, 1997;Cockburn et al, 2000;Bernard et al, 2007) exhibiting strong gradients of the solution. Furthermore, it has different advantages, such as local and global conservativity, or the compactness of the stencil, which enables an easy and efficient parallel implementation (Seny et al, 2013(Seny et al, , 2014. The inter-element discontinuities of the solution constitute a good estimate of the discretisation error (Ainsworth, 2004;Bernard et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has different advantages, such as local and global conservativity, or the compactness of the stencil, which enables an easy and efficient parallel implementation (Seny et al, 2013(Seny et al, , 2014. The inter-element discontinuities of the solution constitute a good estimate of the discretisation error (Ainsworth, 2004;Bernard et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%