2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiport Minimally Invasive Skull Base Surgery: How Many Ports Are Too Many?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26-29 Optimizing surgery by combining multiple ports allows to optimize visualization, trajectory, and working distance, and to maximize the working space between the surgeon's hands and instruments. 6,25,30 In this context, the SE transorbital approach appeared to be a natural complementary route to the endonasal pathway, providing an avenue that gets access to paramedian space. These ideas, well defined in the anatomic laboratory setting, 1,2,4,8,31-33 boosted the endoscopic transorbital approach to access, in clinical practice, the lateral portion of the middle skull base, particularly cavernous sinus and Meckel cave lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26-29 Optimizing surgery by combining multiple ports allows to optimize visualization, trajectory, and working distance, and to maximize the working space between the surgeon's hands and instruments. 6,25,30 In this context, the SE transorbital approach appeared to be a natural complementary route to the endonasal pathway, providing an avenue that gets access to paramedian space. These ideas, well defined in the anatomic laboratory setting, 1,2,4,8,31-33 boosted the endoscopic transorbital approach to access, in clinical practice, the lateral portion of the middle skull base, particularly cavernous sinus and Meckel cave lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%