Superbands, responsible for the backbending in 156Dy and other N = 90 and N = 88 nuclei, are proposed to be aligned n(i~3/2) 2 bands, whereas it is argued that the recently discovered positive parity band in 156Dy with U = (2 +) up to 10 § members does not constitute the low spin extension of the superband.The backbending phenomenon is considered to be caused by the intersection of the ground state band (GSB) by a second rotational band with an appreciably larger moment of inertia and band head energy around 1.5 MeV. The nature of this band has been explained in several ways: The "twin" backbending phenomena observed in 156Dy [6,7] and in lS~Gd [8] has been explained by Andrews et al. [6] and Szymanski and Krumlinde [7] in terms of a superband that intersects both the GSB and the /Lvibrational band. On basis of the level energies, Broglia et al. [9] concluded that the superband most probably has a K + 0 character and suggested a K ~ ---1 § assignment. Recently, E1-Masri et al. [10,11] reported on a group of six 'upper' levels between 1.8 and 2.8 MeV, which might possibly constitute the low spin extension of the superband. In order to * Present address: Natuurkundig Laboratorium der Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1081, Amsterdam/The Netherlands establish spins and parities for these levels, we have measured conversion coefficients of depopulating transitions and established [12] that the six levels can be divided into two groups, one with even spins and positive parities, and another one with odd spins and negative parities. By combining results obtained from the 156Ho decay studies [13] and a recent 158Dy(p,t) reaction study [14], energies were obtained of the 4 + and possibly (2 + ) levels belonging to the positive 'upper' band. The levels are shown in Figure l, together with those of the GSB,/3-and superband. In this paper we want to contradict earlier suggestions [10,11] that this band represents the low spin levels of the superband. The parameter A, inversely proportional to the moment of inertia, as a function of the spin, shows (see Fig. 2) a regular behaviour for the upper-, beta-, superand ground state bands. A pronounced discontinuity exists, though, between the 10 + level of the upper band and the 12 + level of the superband indicating no connection and consequently a different structure. The smoother slope of the upper band and the larger moment of inertia show that the nucleus is, in these states considerably more rigid than in the ground stateand beta bands. This can be caused by an increase of the deformation [3, 41, DE J, as well as by a decrease of the pairing force [53, leading to pairing vibrational states. It was shown by Andrews et al. [6] that the curves of the energies of the ~58Er GSB, the 156Dy and 154Gd beta bands, plotted versus I(I + 1), show a clear similarity.