2019
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2019.2930367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multipoint Synchronization for Fog-Controlled Internet of Things

Abstract: This paper presents a fog-resident controller architecture for synchronizing the operations of large collections of Internet of Things (IoT) such as drones, Internet of Vehicles, etc. Synchronization in IoT is grouped into different classes, use cases identified and multi-point synchronous scheduling algorithms are developed to schedule tasks with varying timing requirements; strict (synchronous) and relaxed (asynchronous and local) onto a bunch of worker nodes that are coordinated by a fog resident controller… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 can be considered a hierarchical model which is suitable for achieving synchronization in IoT. More, synchronization, as defined in [ 42 , 43 ], is the coordination of a group of devices to harmonize the execution of a task by time alignment. So, related to our topology, we can find in the lower level the IoT devices which send a request to the OVS (second level) to forward a packet.…”
Section: Test Scenario and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 can be considered a hierarchical model which is suitable for achieving synchronization in IoT. More, synchronization, as defined in [ 42 , 43 ], is the coordination of a group of devices to harmonize the execution of a task by time alignment. So, related to our topology, we can find in the lower level the IoT devices which send a request to the OVS (second level) to forward a packet.…”
Section: Test Scenario and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies, for example, believe that Blockchain should be used to foster fog computing paradigms [191], while others believe that fog computing should simply act as a middleware-type framework for otherwise traditional cloud computing methods [192]. The exact architecture is also highly debated between studies [190,192,193]; some focus on optimized architecture for real time performance [190,192], while others are focused more on synchronization between nodes [193]. Others acknowledge the need for both synchronization and real-time efforts, but instead focus on adjacent implementations, such as sensor virtualizations [190].…”
Section: Open Research Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synchronization schemes proposed in [22] and [23] focused mainly on achieving synchronization without much consideration on the message overhead caused by the constant communication between worker nodes and the controller. The algorithms were based on the task attributes, time and component redundancy as well as localization of worker nodes.…”
Section: B Synchronization In Real-time Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike DSSP, where workers are expected to have the same or very similar runtimes per iteration, we assume a highly heterogeneous system where runtimes may vary from one iteration to another. The synchronization schemes in [22] and [23] incur extra communication overhead from heavy involvement of the controller. This work achieves fast synchronization by reducing the number of messages sent through clustering and by minimizing the involvement of the controller in making synchronization decisions.…”
Section: Comparison Of This Work and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%