2018
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2018107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplicity and concentration of positive solutions for fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation

Abstract: In this paper we consider the multiplicity and concentration behavior of positive solutions for the following fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equationwhere ε is a positive parameter, (−∆) s is the fractional Laplacian, s ∈ (0, 1) and N > 2s. Suppose that the potential V (x) ∈ C(R N ) satisfies inf R N V (x) > 0, and there exist k points x j ∈ R N such that for each j = 1, · · ·, k, V (x j ) are strict global minimum. When f is subcritical, we prove that the problem has at least k positive solutions for ε > 0 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, many results regarding concentration phenomena for Equation () and its generalizations, under the assumption that infNV>0, have arisen; see, for instance, previous studies 6–18 . In particular, in, Long et al and Shang and Zhang, 15,16,18 multipeak solutions were studied by overlapping single peaks that are sufficiently far away from one another so that one peak has no effect on the other peaks in the areas where decay occurs, avoiding interactions between peaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many results regarding concentration phenomena for Equation () and its generalizations, under the assumption that infNV>0, have arisen; see, for instance, previous studies 6–18 . In particular, in, Long et al and Shang and Zhang, 15,16,18 multipeak solutions were studied by overlapping single peaks that are sufficiently far away from one another so that one peak has no effect on the other peaks in the areas where decay occurs, avoiding interactions between peaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that h u L 2 (R N ) = u L 2 (R N ) for all h ∈ R. Now we recall the notion of barycentre of a function u ∈ H s (R N ) \ {0} which has been introduced in [3,9,31]. Setting…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%