2000
DOI: 10.1007/pl00000120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplicative properties of real functions with applications to classical functions

Abstract: From the characterisation of geometrically convex and geometrically concave functions defined on (0, A] or [A, ∞) with A > 0, by means of their multiplicative conditions, we obtain unified proofs of some known and new inequalities. Functions of class C 2 and strictly increasing on (a, b) fulfil some kind of supermultiplicativity and superadditivity. We have obtained a new constant determining the intervals of sub-and supermultiplicativity for the log function.Mathematics Subject Classification (1991). 26A09, 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition that log(g(r)) is a convex function of log(r) is sometimes stated as g is multiplicatively convex [9] or g is geometrically convex [3]. The next theorem shows that such functions arise in a natural way in complex analysis.…”
Section: Background Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The condition that log(g(r)) is a convex function of log(r) is sometimes stated as g is multiplicatively convex [9] or g is geometrically convex [3]. The next theorem shows that such functions arise in a natural way in complex analysis.…”
Section: Background Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We will also need the following result which is a multiplicative version of Petrović's inequality [10] due to Finol and Wójtowicz [3]. For the sake of completeness, we provide a direct proof.…”
Section: Background Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, the question of selection dominance reduces to the question of what restrictions that must be imposed on the transformation u = F • G −1 in order to ensure that (17) holds. The following result, which is essentially specialized and simplified statement of Theorem 1 in Finol and Wójtowicz (2000), will prove to be of great assistance in answering this question.…”
Section: Conditions For Selection Dominancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…REMARK 3. Comments on the relevance of sub-and supermultiplicative functions in various fields as well as references on this subject can be found in [6]. REMARK 4.…”
Section: Inequalities and Monotonicitymentioning
confidence: 99%