Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents

Abstract

We describe here a multiplexed protein quantitation strategy that provides relative and absolute measurements of proteins in complex mixtures. At the core of this methodology is a multiplexed set of isobaric reagents that yield amine-derivatized peptides. The derivatized peptides are indistinguishable in MS, but exhibit intense low-mass MS/MS signature ions that support quantitation. In this study, we have examined the global protein expression of a wild-type yeast strain and the isogenic upf1⌬ and xrn1⌬ mutant strains that are defective in the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and the general 5 to 3 decay pathways, respectively. We also demonstrate the use of 4-fold multiplexing to enable relative protein measurements simultaneously with determination of absolute levels of a target protein using synthetic isobaric peptide standards. We find that inactivation of Upf1p and Xrn1p causes common as well as unique effects on protein expression. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 3:1154 -1169, 2004.An initial step in the systematic investigation of cellular processes is the identification and measurement of expression levels of relevant sets of proteins. Recently, quantitative approaches utilizing MS and a host of stable isotope-labeling chemistries have emerged (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2), offering a departure from traditional techniques employing comparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The ICAT quantitative labeling strategy (3, 4) is perhaps the best-characterized method for relative protein quantitation using MS. Other elegant approaches use cell-culture enrichment with a stable isotope-labeled amino acid, including arginine (5), lysine (6), tyrosine (7), and leucine (8), for in vivo incorporation of a mass difference to support relative quantitation. This circumvents potential difficulties surrounding chemical labeling downstream in a comparative experiment. All of these methods impart a mass difference as the basis for quantitation by measurement of relative peak areas of MS and/or MS/MS mass spectra. There are, however, a number of limitations imposed by mass-difference labeling. The mass-difference concept for many practical purposes is limited to a binary (2-plex) set of reagents, and this makes comparison of multiple states (e.g. several experimental controls or time-course studies) difficult to undertake. Multiple 2-plex datasets can be combined after separate analyses, but there is a high likelihood that different sets of peptides and proteins will be identified between each experiment. In addition, the use of massdifference labels increases MS complexity, and this problem increases with numbers of a multiplexed set. Finally, the cysteine-selective affinity strategy for reduction of sample complexity (ICAT) is not amenable to identification of post-translationally modified peptides, as the majority of posttranslational modification (PTM) 1 -containing peptides are discarded at the affinity step.We have developed a multiplexed set of reagents for quantitative protein analysis that place isobaric mass label...

Using Laboratory Information Management Systems as central part of a proteomics data workflow

“…MASCOT Integra facilitates quantification. Methods such as iTRAQ [31] or tandem mass tag (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) are supported for MASCOT results directly by Integra. Additionally, MASCOT Distiller quantification results (e.g.…”

“…The project team particularly announces support of peptide quantization experiments (e.g. iTRAQ [31,34] and SILAC [35][36][37]). Furthermore, the installation routine is now considerably simplified.…”

“…Several quantification possibilities are already available for ProSE including analysis of iTRAQ [31,34] and DIGE [50] surveys. Label-free quantification can be performed on the basis of the msInspect output.…”

Quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures using FTMS and differential mass spectrometry

“…Many quantitative proteomics techniques use isotopic labeling of proteins, including metabolic labeling [4 -6] or chemical labeling strategies [7][8][9], before mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. Methods that involve direct analyses of complex protein samples without isotope labeling (labelfree MS profiling methods) have also had some success [10 -14].…”

Protein quantification by selective isolation and fragmentation of isotopic pairs using FT-ICR MS

“…When modeling cellular pathways and networks it is important to quantify the constituent proteins. Relative quantification methods are designed to compare protein amounts in matched samples [2]. However, these methods are limited to identifying changes in the amount of a protein with respect to a second cellular state and samples vary even within control sets of the same organism [3].…”