2014
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplexed aberration measurement for deep tissue imaging in vivo

Abstract: We describe a multiplexed aberration measurement method that modulates the intensity or phase of light rays at multiple pupil segments in parallel to determine their phase gradients. Applicable to fluorescent-protein-labeled structures of arbitrary complexity, it allows us to obtain diffraction-limited resolution in various samples in vivo. For the strongly scattering mouse brain, a single aberration correction improves structural and functional imaging of fine neuronal processes over a large imaging volume.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In IVM, penetration depth is often limited by aberration caused by the sample itself, which may be compensated for by using adaptive optics, for instance using a correction collar (Muriello and Dunn, 2008), a deformable membrane mirror (Caroline Müllenbroich et al, 2014) or segmented pupil illumination (Ji et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2014), which can correct for sample aberrations by increasing signal at depth. Alternatively, image-based metrics can be used to estimate the sample aberrations (Burke et al, 2015;Débarre et al, 2009;Song et al, 2010).…”
Section: Correcting For Sample Aberrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In IVM, penetration depth is often limited by aberration caused by the sample itself, which may be compensated for by using adaptive optics, for instance using a correction collar (Muriello and Dunn, 2008), a deformable membrane mirror (Caroline Müllenbroich et al, 2014) or segmented pupil illumination (Ji et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2014), which can correct for sample aberrations by increasing signal at depth. Alternatively, image-based metrics can be used to estimate the sample aberrations (Burke et al, 2015;Débarre et al, 2009;Song et al, 2010).…”
Section: Correcting For Sample Aberrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detectors that combine high frame rate, high sensitivity and large pixel number would be desirable. The SNR of the system, and thus the total number of cells that can be imaged, may also be improved by implementing adaptive optics (Ji et al, 2010(Ji et al, , 2012Wang et al, 2014). This solution would compensate for distortions of the excitation beam introduced along the optical path and within the biological sample, thus improving the efficiency of fluorescence excitation.…”
Section: Scanning and Scanless Imaging Of Neuronal Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for most experiments, only a small fraction is used to illuminate a biological sample. For example, when imaging the superficial layers of the murine neocortex with a single scanned excitation spot, an average power between 10 mW (for superficial layer 2/3) and 100 mW (for deep layer 5) is sufficient for functional recordings with the calcium indicator GCaMP6 [7]. As the transmittance of the microscope's optical path can be optimized to >50%, considerable potential exists for less expensive laser sources with a few hundreds of mW output power and with a center wavelength close to the absorption peak of selected fluorophores (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%