2001
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v97.3.805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction screening in childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia

Abstract: To determine the incidence of leukemiaspecific rearrangements, 60 cases of childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia and transient myeloproliferative disorder were screened with a novel multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, and the results were correlated with the cytogenetic findings. The RT-PCR assay detects 28 different fusion genes and more than 80 different fusion transcript variants. RNA was isolated from methanol/acetic acid-fixed cells that had been routinely prepared fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
42
2
Order By: Relevance
“…29 The gene in 19q13 is unknown. Neither inv(8)(p11q13) involving TIF2/NCOA2 (nuclear receptor coactivator 2), described in seven cases, 11,12,[30][31][32][33] Fwere found in our series.…”
Section: Cytogenetic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…29 The gene in 19q13 is unknown. Neither inv(8)(p11q13) involving TIF2/NCOA2 (nuclear receptor coactivator 2), described in seven cases, 11,12,[30][31][32][33] Fwere found in our series.…”
Section: Cytogenetic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Recently, multiple RT-PCR analyses have also been used as a screening tool for detection of genetic rearrangements, 9 for in vitro toxicology screening, 10 and for validation of gene sets obtained from global screens. 11 We verified the multiple RT-PCR results using the real-time RT-PCR method in a previous study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, additional analyses, such as split-out and modified post-PCR southern blot analysis are required for the detection and verification of an FG. [23][24][25][26] A recent publication describes a multiplex reaction followed by biochip detection to screen samples for the presence of translocations, but this technology is only applicable to well-characterized fusion events. 27 Moreover, the continual identification of new breakpoints, especially for MLL partner genes, as well as the technical complexity of this kind of assay, increase the risk of false negative and false positive results due to cross-contamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%