2014
DOI: 10.1186/s13039-014-0084-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and array comparative genomic hybridization analyses for prenatal diagnosis of cytogenomic abnormalities

Abstract: BackgroundThe aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical utility of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analyses on prenatal cases and to review prenatal ultrasound findings of cytogenomic syndromes.ResultsOf the 54 prenatal cases analyzed, cytogenomic abnormalities were characterized in 14 cases. In four fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings, a 40.701 Mb duplication of 8q22.3-q24.3 and a 23.839 Mb deletion of 7q33-q36.3 derived f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from WES and WGS, genomic strategies used in the field of molecular cytogenetics (i.e. array comparative genomic hybridization-aCGH) to identify unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variants (CNV) are increasingly common in dysmorphology and in prenatal diagnosis; for certain disorders (as intellectual disability, autism and multiple congenital anomalies), aCGH is considered an appropriate first-tier diagnostic test (Xu et al 2014;South et al 2013). Finally, current technical limitations of NGS make it inadequate for disorders caused by expansion of oligonucleotide repeats, CNV and alterations in highly repetitive DNA regions (Bras et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from WES and WGS, genomic strategies used in the field of molecular cytogenetics (i.e. array comparative genomic hybridization-aCGH) to identify unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variants (CNV) are increasingly common in dysmorphology and in prenatal diagnosis; for certain disorders (as intellectual disability, autism and multiple congenital anomalies), aCGH is considered an appropriate first-tier diagnostic test (Xu et al 2014;South et al 2013). Finally, current technical limitations of NGS make it inadequate for disorders caused by expansion of oligonucleotide repeats, CNV and alterations in highly repetitive DNA regions (Bras et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NDN gene also contains methylation probes while it has a known tendency to over-digest resulted in variable results. The experiment procedures were performed following the manufacturer’s protocol [ 18 , 42 ]. The MS-MLPA data was imported into the software Coffalyser.Net (designed by MRC-Holland) to analyze both the copy number variation and the methylation profile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The possibility of replacing karyotyping by aCGH or by aCGH in addition to multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) or quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) has been increasingly discussed among scientific community, namely in fetus with ultrasound abnormalities. 3,57…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%