2016
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.255315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR Quantification of Recurrent Somatic Mutations in Diffuse Large B-Cell and Follicular Lymphoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND:A plethora of options to detect mutations in tumor-derived DNA currently exist but each suffers limitations in analytical sensitivity, cost, or scalability. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is an appealing technology for detecting the presence of specific mutations based on a priori knowledge and can be applied to tumor biopsies, including formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues. More recently, ddPCR has gained popularity in its utility in quantifying circulating tumor DNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the feasibility of ddPCR for MYD88 p.(L265P) detection, it was first analyzed whether results of ddPCR on FFPE material were comparable to those of former NGS analysis. As shown in Table , the results of ddPCR and NGS matched perfectly, which corresponds to previous studies that investigated correlation of NGS and ddPCR for MYD88 p.(L265P) detection or proved applicability of ddPCR for MYD88 p.(L265P) detection for several non‐Hodgkin lymphomas on FFPE material, as well as on fresh tumor tissue and in liquid biopsies (blood) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To investigate the feasibility of ddPCR for MYD88 p.(L265P) detection, it was first analyzed whether results of ddPCR on FFPE material were comparable to those of former NGS analysis. As shown in Table , the results of ddPCR and NGS matched perfectly, which corresponds to previous studies that investigated correlation of NGS and ddPCR for MYD88 p.(L265P) detection or proved applicability of ddPCR for MYD88 p.(L265P) detection for several non‐Hodgkin lymphomas on FFPE material, as well as on fresh tumor tissue and in liquid biopsies (blood) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the complication risk of a brain biopsy, mutation detection in CSF is preferred. 20,21 In addition, we have shown that ddPCR is a highly reliable and sensitive method for detection of MYD88 p.(L265P) in CSF ( Notwithstanding the previously mentioned advantages of ddPCR, one must realize that NGS is becoming more and more standard procedure for analyzing lymphomas. Also, NGS is evolving rapidly and is increasingly able to analyze small DNA concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other recent studies that evaluated plasma cfDNA levels in DLBCL (Kurtz et al, 2018), addressing whether it can predict or monitor therapy response or if it can predict tumor burden or prognosis of FL cases (Delfau-Larue et al, 2018). Using droplet digital PCR, Alcaide et al detected previously known mutations (e.g., EZH2 Y641 and STAT6 D419) in circulating tumor DNA in major B cell NHL subtypes (Alcaide et al, 2016).…”
Section: Noninvasive Clinical Applications Of Genomic Alterations Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the ddPCR assay has been widely used to detect genetic and epigenetic alterations . ddPCR can detect very rare sequences with high precision and sensitivity by partitioning individual target molecules within distinct compartments and, therefore, reduces the limitations of conventional methods such as classic real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR) or the amplification refractory mutation system qPCR (ARMS qPCR) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the sensitivity of NGS is superior to that of direct Recently, the ddPCR assay has been widely used to detect genetic and epigenetic alterations. [18][19][20][21] ddPCR can detect very rare sequences with high precision and sensitivity by partitioning individual target molecules within distinct compartments and, therefore, reduces the limitations of conventional methods such as classic real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) or the amplification refractory mutation system qPCR (ARMS qPCR). [22][23][24] However, the PNA-LNA clamp method is a molecular probe-based PCR method; its unique design and allele-specific approach allow exceptionally high specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%