2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2562520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Uses of Mobile Money: Implications for Financial Inclusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Yenkey et al . (2014) find that parents, rather than children, are the most frequent sending group. The use of M‐Pesa for saving increased between the surveys; lower risk and ease of use were the most frequent reasons given for saving through M‐Pesa instead of traditional repositories at home.…”
Section: Mobile Money: Theory and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Yenkey et al . (2014) find that parents, rather than children, are the most frequent sending group. The use of M‐Pesa for saving increased between the surveys; lower risk and ease of use were the most frequent reasons given for saving through M‐Pesa instead of traditional repositories at home.…”
Section: Mobile Money: Theory and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaffenberger (2014) highlighted the slow uptake of M-Shwari services in Kenya, with only 30% of users utilizing the platform for accessing mobile loans, and a mere 14% using it for saving purposes. Yenkey et al (2014) found that saving money through M-Pesa services is perceived as less risky and more convenient compared to traditional saving methods at home. Fanta et al ( 2016) conducted a study on the role of mobile money in nancial inclusion in the SADC region and found that mobile money is predominantly used for transactions and remittances rather than saving purposes.…”
Section: Mobile Phones As Saving Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First is by enhancing risk sharing through family, and second is through their social networks. Those who are financially included are more likely to send and receive remittances from family and friends than those who are not (Jack & Suri, 2014; Yenkey et al, 2014). This helps them to withstand negative shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%