2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49055-7_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Structure Recovery via Probabilistic Biclustering

Abstract: Multiple Structure Recovery (MSR) represents an important and challenging problem in the field of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recent approaches to MSR advocate the use of clustering techniques. In this paper we propose an alternative method which investigates the usage of biclustering in MSR scenario. The main idea behind the use of biclustering approaches to MSR is to isolate subsets of points that behave “coherently” in a subset of models/structures. Specifically, we adopt a recent generative bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 as RS-NMU. We clarify that RPA [11] and FABIA [3] achieve good results; however, to yield these performances, they use the ground truth number of models as an input. The remaining methods, as well as the method here proposed, automatically estimate this number.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 as RS-NMU. We clarify that RPA [11] and FABIA [3] achieve good results; however, to yield these performances, they use the ground truth number of models as an input. The remaining methods, as well as the method here proposed, automatically estimate this number.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next estimate multiple fundamental matrices (moving camera and moving objects) and multiple homographies (moving planar objects) on the images in the AdelaideRMF dataset [22]. This is a standard dataset in the literature (e.g., [3,10,11,15,18,22]), but as pointed out in [18] it contains a non-negligible quantity of errors in its ground truth. This implies that, beyond some point, an improvement in the actual performance might not necessarily reflect itself as an improvement compared to the ground truth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their method gains robustness via a t-test that efficiently filters out statistically insignificant hypotheses. Denitto et al [36] propose an approach to compute a sparse low-rank representation of the preference matrix using FABIA [37] and obtain bi-clusters, i.e. clustering in rows and columns of the matrix, that allows points to belong to different geometric models simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Here we also compare against Random Cluster Models Simulated Annealing (RCMSA) [92], Robust Preference Analysis (RPA) [34], FABIA [36], Multi-X [41], Mode-Seeking on Hypergraphs Fitting (MSHF) [46], and Convex Relaxation Algorithm (CORAL) [40]. Our model yields competitive performance with a particularly low error for motion model estimation.…”
Section: Geometric Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%