2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple States of Nitrile Hydratase from Rhodococcus equi TG328-2: Structural and Mechanistic Insights from Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Density Functional Theory Studies

Abstract: Iron-type nitrile hydratases (NHases) contain an Fe(III) ion coordinated in a characteristic “claw setting” by an axial cysteine thiolate, two equatorial peptide nitrogens, the sulfur atoms of equatorial cysteine-sulfenic and cysteine-sulfinic acids, and an axial water/hydroxyl moiety. The cysteine-sulfenic acid is susceptible to oxidation, and the enzyme is traditionally prepared using butyric acid as an oxidative protectant. The as-prepared enzyme exhibits a complex electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the g ϭ 1.92 region contains only the contributions from overlapping individual g 2 or g 2,3 (g Ќ ) lines of distinct multiline rhombic or axial signals, the raw integral was multiplied by a factor of 7.41. This factor was derived from comparison of the integrated intensities of the g ʈ line and the entire spectrum of a rhombic S ϭ 1 ⁄ 2 Fe(III) signal from nitrile hydratase, with a spectral envelope of 450 G, that showed that 6% of the total spin density was reflected in the double integral of the single g ʈ line (114). The conversion factor was then scaled for the ratios of the squares of the spectral envelopes of the nitrile hydratase signal (450 G) and an averaged envelope for the FeS clusters (300 G) that contribute to the g ϭ 1.92 region (7).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Oxidants Targeted Probes and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the g ϭ 1.92 region contains only the contributions from overlapping individual g 2 or g 2,3 (g Ќ ) lines of distinct multiline rhombic or axial signals, the raw integral was multiplied by a factor of 7.41. This factor was derived from comparison of the integrated intensities of the g ʈ line and the entire spectrum of a rhombic S ϭ 1 ⁄ 2 Fe(III) signal from nitrile hydratase, with a spectral envelope of 450 G, that showed that 6% of the total spin density was reflected in the double integral of the single g ʈ line (114). The conversion factor was then scaled for the ratios of the squares of the spectral envelopes of the nitrile hydratase signal (450 G) and an averaged envelope for the FeS clusters (300 G) that contribute to the g ϭ 1.92 region (7).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Oxidants Targeted Probes and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that Fe 3+ −NHases shows higher affinity to aliphatic nitriles as substrates, while the Co 3+ −NHases to aromatic compounds. Experimental EPR measures are available [124] only for Fe 3+ -type NHase, because the d 6 low spin electronic configuration of Co 3+ −NHase enzymes does not allow their inspection by EPR spectroscopy. However, other spectroscopic data are available for Co 3+ −NHases [124].…”
Section: Low Spin Fe 3+ and Co 3+ Nitrile Hydratasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental EPR measures are available [124] only for Fe 3+ -type NHase, because the d 6 low spin electronic configuration of Co 3+ −NHase enzymes does not allow their inspection by EPR spectroscopy. However, other spectroscopic data are available for Co 3+ −NHases [124].…”
Section: Low Spin Fe 3+ and Co 3+ Nitrile Hydratasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional "fields" due to nuclear Zeeman and quadrupolar interactions can generally be neglected in the present context. EPR can, in principle, provide a wealth of information on the identity, chemical nature, chemical environment, electronic structure, and physical structure of the analyte from analysis of each of these interactions, typically employing computer analysis and simulations, and increasingly with quantum chemistry calculations (density functional theory, Taylor theory) [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76] . However, in the case of biological tissues, the origins and spectroscopic parameters of many of the EPR signals have been well-characterized, as described in detail below.…”
Section: Electron Paramagnetic Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%