2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple square sutures for postpartum hemorrhage: results and hysteroscopic assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Severe complications, such as uterine necrosis and pyometra, were not observed in any group. Different UCS placement methods have been proposed, and various outcomes and associated complications have been reported . To our knowledge, however, no previous studies have compared postoperative complications between women treated with and those not treated with UCSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Severe complications, such as uterine necrosis and pyometra, were not observed in any group. Different UCS placement methods have been proposed, and various outcomes and associated complications have been reported . To our knowledge, however, no previous studies have compared postoperative complications between women treated with and those not treated with UCSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported the occurrence of intrauterine adhesions after uterine compression suturing . For example, Alouini et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,23 The incidence of IUS in this study was 18 18 These high figures may be attributed to the study design, which included women who delivered mainly by caesarean section, and in whom multiple and combined haemostatic techniques to control PPH were utilised. As such, we excluded women with a history of intrauterine infection or those who had undergone any intrauterine manipulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…9,10,12,15,20,21 Hysteroscopy is considered as the gold standard for uterine cavity assessment and has great efficacy in diagnosing IUS because it can confirm the presence, extent and degree of adhesions. 27 Among the previously published data, only Alouini et al 18 reported the use of a standardised classification system for identifying the extent of IUS. 28 Various classification systems have been proposed or intrauterine adhesions, including those by March et al, 29 the European Society classification, 30 American Fertility Society classification, 25 Valle and Sciarra classification, 31 Donnez and Nisolle classification 32 and Nasr et al classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation