2017
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple species of cuckoos are superior predictors of bird species richness in Asia

Abstract: Abstract. The abundance and the presence of common cuckoos Cuculus canorus have been shown to predict species richness of birds across Europe, while there are no such analyses available for other continents where species richness of parasitic cuckoos is larger. Here, we tested whether species richness of birds increased with the number of cuckoo species in two study areas in China and one in Japan. We also tested whether species richness of birds can be predicted by the number of cuckoo individuals. Furthermor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though many of the randomly drawn species groups performed better as an indicator than titmice, in France, the species sets included in those random species groups cannot be observed as easily as titmice. Similarly, other commonly used indicator bird species groups, such as woodpeckers (Menon & Shahabuddin, 2021; Mikusiński et al, 2001) or cuckoos (Møller et al, 2017), are relatively less abundant and diverse, and more habitat specialized than many titmouse species, potentially making them less suitable indicators for forest bird abundances. Titmice have many features of a suitable ecological indicator group: cost‐efficient observations, well‐known biology, conspicuous behavior, almost global distribution (Caro & O'Doherty, 1999; del Hoyo et al, 2007; Gill et al, 2005; Landres et al, 1988), and ecological traits broadly overlapping with those of a wide range of the target species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Even though many of the randomly drawn species groups performed better as an indicator than titmice, in France, the species sets included in those random species groups cannot be observed as easily as titmice. Similarly, other commonly used indicator bird species groups, such as woodpeckers (Menon & Shahabuddin, 2021; Mikusiński et al, 2001) or cuckoos (Møller et al, 2017), are relatively less abundant and diverse, and more habitat specialized than many titmouse species, potentially making them less suitable indicators for forest bird abundances. Titmice have many features of a suitable ecological indicator group: cost‐efficient observations, well‐known biology, conspicuous behavior, almost global distribution (Caro & O'Doherty, 1999; del Hoyo et al, 2007; Gill et al, 2005; Landres et al, 1988), and ecological traits broadly overlapping with those of a wide range of the target species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of indicator species to estimate target species occurrence or abundance can be based on similar responses to abiotic factors (Caro & O'Doherty, 1999 ; Sætersdal et al, 2003 ) or biotic associations between the indicator and target species groups (Møller et al, 2017 ; Sergio et al, 2006 ). Even though negative interspecific interactions, such as competition, can negatively affect species co‐occurrence and abundance (Forsman et al, 2008 ; Goldberg & Barton, 1992 ), shared habitat preference and positive interspecific interactions may promote co‐occurrence of species and create aggregations of individuals (Basile et al, 2021 ; Forsman et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations