Multiple sleep bruxism data collected using a self-contained EMG detector/analyzer system in asymptomatic healthy subjects

Minakuchi, Hajime; Sakaguchi, Chiyomi; Hara, Emilio Satoshi; Maekawa, Kenji; Matsuka, Yoshizo; Clark, Glenn T.; Kuboki, Takuo

doi:10.1007/s11325-011-0602-1

Cited by 12 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Castroflorio et al (2015; Manfredini et al, 2014; Yachida et al, 2016). On the other hand, EMG monitoring of SB can be reliable (Castroflorio, Deregibus, Bargellini, Debernardi, & Manfredini, 2014; Gallo, Lavigne, Rompre, & Palla, 1997; Haketa et al, 2003; Minakuchi et al, 2012; Stuginski‐Barbosa, Porporatti, Costa, Svensson, & Conti, 2016). Given the precedent established in the literature, we would argue that the EMG results were worth reporting, but with emphasis on cautionary interpretation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Over‐the‐counter bite splints: A randomized controlled trial of compliance and efficacy

Gerstner

Yao

Siripurapu

et al. 2020

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Occlusal splints are often used to curb the impacts of sleep bruxism (SB) on the dentition, and over‐the‐counter (OCT) options are becoming increasingly popular. OTC splints are usually fabricated at home by patients, but not routinely evaluated by dental professionals. It is unclear how OCT splints compare with more traditional splints that receive dental oversight. Objectives The present randomized controlled study tested how an OTC splint compared with a gold standard bite splint in terms of patient compliance (primary outcome) and efficacy (secondary outcomes). Methods Sixty‐seven subjects were randomly assigned to receive either the OTC (SOVA, N = 35) splint or the gold standard “Michigan” bite splint (MI, N = 32), with 61 completing the study (SOVA, N = 30; MI, N = 31). OTC‐splint subjects were required to fabricate their splints to clinically acceptable standards. Both groups wore the splints nightly for four months. Compliance was measured via daily diary. Efficacy outcomes evaluated stability, retention, periodontal health, night‐time rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA), and material wear. Results OTC‐splint subjects had difficulty fabricating splints to clinically acceptable standards. The number of night‐time RMMA bursts was significantly greater for the OTC splint group. Compliance and all other efficacy measurements were not significantly different between‐groups. Conclusions The results support the potential use of OTC splints for curbing the impacts of SB. However, the results strongly suggest that dentists should be actively engaged in overseeing patients' use of self‐fabricated appliances. This clinical trial is registered at http://ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier number NCT02340663.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Over‐the‐counter bite splints: A randomized controlled trial of compliance and efficacy

Gerstner

Yao

Siripurapu

et al. 2020

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Devices used more commonly were the 'Grindcare' in different versions 22,31,37,52,56,57,[61][62][63][64][66][67][68][69][70] (n = 15; 19%), followed by the 'Bitestrip' 13,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] (n = 12; 15%), and the 'Bruxoff' 30,[82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89] (n = 9; 12%) device (see online Appendix for overview). Pictures of devices were provided in 18 (23%) of the studies.…”

Section: Recording Hardwarementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most studies (n = 44; 57%) utilised a single-channel assembly, 13,14,22,31,37,39,52,54,56,57,[60][61][62][63][64][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]90,91,[95][96][97][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107] and two and three channels were utilised in 13 (17%) 11,12,32,33,52,59,[92]…”

Section: Recording Hardwarementioning

confidence: 99%

Signal acquisition and analysis of ambulatory electromyographic recordings for the assessment of sleep bruxism: A scoping review

Thymi

Lobbezoo

Ahlberg

et al. 2021

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Jest nadzieja w postaci przenośnych urządzeń wykorzystujących kryteria zaproponowane przez Lavigne i wsp., 61 które również mogą być używane w domu przez pacjenta, a tym samym zapewnić obniżenie kosztów i większy komfort pacjenta, ponieważ badanie może nastąpić w zaciszu własnego domu. [70][71][72][73][74] BruxChecker (Scheu-Dental, Niemcy) lub Bruxoff (Bioelettronica, Włochy), który wykorzystuje dwie koncentryczne elektrody EMG dla zapisu żwacza i mięśni skroniowych w nocy, cały czas monitorując EKG pacjenta za pośrednictwem trzech koncentrycznych elektrod. [75][76][77] Odpowiada autonomiczno--sercowej teorii o bruksizmie.…”

Section: Diagnozaunclassified

Bruxism: Aetiology and diagnostics. A literature review

Saczuk¹,

Wilmont²,

Pawlak³

et al. 2018

Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bruxism is one of the least known dysfunctions of the stomatognathic system. Bruxism decreases significantly the rate of success not only in a perspective prosthetic treatment, but also in restorative dentistry, periodontics or even surgical procedures. Presently, theories pertaining to bruxism evolve around the impulses coming from the central nervous system, which in turn cause a temporary nocturnal tachycardia, followed by a bilateral contraction of the masseter muscles. However, the multifactoral and complex aetiology of bruxism still requires further consideration and research.

show abstract

Multiple sleep bruxism data collected using a self-contained EMG detector/analyzer system in asymptomatic healthy subjects

Cited by 12 publications

References 19 publications

Over‐the‐counter bite splints: A randomized controlled trial of compliance and efficacy

Over‐the‐counter bite splints: A randomized controlled trial of compliance and efficacy

Signal acquisition and analysis of ambulatory electromyographic recordings for the assessment of sleep bruxism: A scoping review

Bruxism: Aetiology and diagnostics. A literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About