2016
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2015.2505638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Scattering Effects With Cyclical Correction in Active Remote Sensing of Vegetated Surface Using Vector Radiative Transfer Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistent combined active and passive model based on NMM3D-DBA adopts a single scattering model for vegetation; it has been shown to be able to provide good estimations for backscatter and brightness temperature at L-band for wheat, winter wheat, pasture, and canola fields. As the frequency increases, multiple scattering effects in vegetation become more important [26]. Thus, at frequencies much higher than L-band, a multiple scattering approach should be used for vegetation instead of the distorted Born approximation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The consistent combined active and passive model based on NMM3D-DBA adopts a single scattering model for vegetation; it has been shown to be able to provide good estimations for backscatter and brightness temperature at L-band for wheat, winter wheat, pasture, and canola fields. As the frequency increases, multiple scattering effects in vegetation become more important [26]. Thus, at frequencies much higher than L-band, a multiple scattering approach should be used for vegetation instead of the distorted Born approximation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective scattering effects of the vegetation scatterers are important for the soybean [38], thus a more accurate coherent model must be used for this vegetation type. For the corn field, multiple scattering effects [26] must be included because of the large scattering albedo and optical thickness. These two vegetation types and more accurate scattering models for higher frequencies will be studied in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretical models that estimate ω from assumptions on geometrical and dielectrical properties of the vegetation-constituents usually obtain much higher values. For example, Ferrazzoli et al [40] obtains values between ∼ 0.4 to 0.6 for the "branch-layer of an old forest at L-band (θ 0 = 35 • )", Xie et al [41] reports ω-values ranging from 0.3 to as high as 0.8 for "soy-and cotton fields with varying leave-and stem parameters at C-, X-and Ku-band" and Liao et al [42] investigates the dependence of ω on the vegetation-water content of corn-fields and finds values between 0.4 and 0.6 for V-polarized radiation at 1.26 GHz.…”
Section: Numerical Value Of the Single Scattering Albedomentioning
confidence: 99%