1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(75)90135-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple retention deficits following one-trial appetitive training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, none of these studies includes a systematic range 01' training-testing intervals during the 24 h following training, as in Holloway and Wansley's aversive conditioning experiments. In arecent experiment, however, Wansley and Holloway (1975) interval during the 24 h following training, and they obtained a phasic retention function similar to that found in their aversive paradigms (Holloway & Wansley, 1973a, b). They deprived rats of water for 24 h prior to one-trial appetitive maze training in which 5-min access to water was the reinforcer and tested for retention at intervals of 0.25, 1,6, 12, 18, or 24 h. Retention at 0.25, 1, 12, and 24 h was greater than at 6 and 18 h.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, none of these studies includes a systematic range 01' training-testing intervals during the 24 h following training, as in Holloway and Wansley's aversive conditioning experiments. In arecent experiment, however, Wansley and Holloway (1975) interval during the 24 h following training, and they obtained a phasic retention function similar to that found in their aversive paradigms (Holloway & Wansley, 1973a, b). They deprived rats of water for 24 h prior to one-trial appetitive maze training in which 5-min access to water was the reinforcer and tested for retention at intervals of 0.25, 1,6, 12, 18, or 24 h. Retention at 0.25, 1, 12, and 24 h was greater than at 6 and 18 h.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Second, motivational factors (deprivation time) must be controlled across the various intervals to prevent an interaction with possible retention fluctuations. Wansley and Holloway (1975) resolved the first problem but possibly not the second. They allowed all groups to have lO-min access to water 1 h prior to training, and 1 h prior to testing gave another lO-min access to water for all groups except those tested at 0.25 and 1 h. This procedure was designed to equate the degree of deprivation across groups, although the possibility of differing deprivation levels exists because the rats in the various groups were deprived to differing degrees at the time of the 10-min free access period, in addition to the obvious problems for the 0.25-and l-h conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, we think this is not the case, since this type of masking effect would presumably be present in tone-cued fear conditioning and is not apparent. Although this may be resolved by additional groups trained at one ZT but tested at another, this would result in comparing animals with different training-testing intervals, which can lead to different performances (Holloway & Wansley, 1973a, 1973bWansley & Holloway, 1975, 1976.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…passive avoidance learning (Holloway & Wansley, 1973a, 1973bWansley & Holloway, 1976), as well as one-trial appetitivelearning (Wansley & Holloway, 1975), have been well characterized. These retention deficits represent an inability of the animal to retrieve the memory of a learning experience when the training-testing delay is at non-24-h intervals and are flattened by lesions of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (the master biological clock in mammals; Stephan & Kovacevic, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Day/night cycle CIRCADIAN organization may play a critical role in memory processes [4,5,9,10]. Thus phase-shifting circadian rhythms in rats shortly after passive avoidance training impaired their performance during retention testing, suggesting that disrupting circadian organization produces retrograde amnesia [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%