1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(95)79915-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple residues specify external tetraethylammonium blockade in voltage-gated potassium channels

Abstract: We have mapped residues in the carboxyl half of the P region of a voltage-gated K+ channel that influence external tetraethylammonium (TEA) block. Fifteen amino acids were substituted with cysteine and expressed in oocytes from monomeric or heterodimeric cRNAs. From a total of six mutant channels with altered TEA sensitivity, three were susceptible to modification by extracellularly applied charged methanethiosulfonates (MTSX). Another residue did not affect TEA block but was protected from MTSX by TEA. MTSX m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a similar interaction with a bacterial channel has been modeled with molecular dynamics (Crouzy et al, 2001;Guidoni and Carloni, 2002;Luzhkov et al, 2003) and studied by crystallization with TEA analogs (Lenaeus et al, 2005). However, site-directed mutagenesis and chemical modification results have called this model into question for Kv2.1: although the tyrosine side chain clearly has a role in external TEA block, it may not cage or bind TEA stably or directly in mammalian Kv2.1 channels (Pascual et al, 1995;Andalib et al, 2004). The uncertainty in the mechanism of the TEA block of Kv2.1 makes interpretation of the competition between TEA and 48F10, but not catechol and many derivatives, difficult to interpret in structural terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a similar interaction with a bacterial channel has been modeled with molecular dynamics (Crouzy et al, 2001;Guidoni and Carloni, 2002;Luzhkov et al, 2003) and studied by crystallization with TEA analogs (Lenaeus et al, 2005). However, site-directed mutagenesis and chemical modification results have called this model into question for Kv2.1: although the tyrosine side chain clearly has a role in external TEA block, it may not cage or bind TEA stably or directly in mammalian Kv2.1 channels (Pascual et al, 1995;Andalib et al, 2004). The uncertainty in the mechanism of the TEA block of Kv2.1 makes interpretation of the competition between TEA and 48F10, but not catechol and many derivatives, difficult to interpret in structural terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dSlo this position is a tyrosine, Y308, and external TEA blocks dSlo channels with high affinity and weak voltage dependence, consistent with its interaction with Y308 on the outer mouth of the pore; in Y308V-substituted channels TEA blocks with an apparent affinity 100 times less than it does the wild-type channel [27]. However, in Shaker-like chan- nels several other residues also affect sensitivity to TEA [20,24]. Inhibition of current by increasing concentrations of external TEA was measured at different membrane potentials ( Fig.…”
Section: Y293w and F294w Dslo Channelsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[5] The binding of external TEA is critically affected by the presence of one residue present in each of the four subunits, which is located adjacent to the signature sequence within the selectivity filter (GYGD) of K + channels. Channels possessing an aromatic residue, such as a phenylalanine or a tyrosine, for example, Y379 in mKv1.1, [6] Y380 in Kv2.1, [7] Y82 in KcsA, [8] the T449Y mutant of Shaker, [9] or the V515F mutant of rSK3 [5d] are more sensitive to block by TEA. In recent years, an explosion in the number of crystal structures of ion channels, combined with the use of molecular modelling, has led to different assumptions about the type of interaction between TEA and these aromatic residues.…”
Section: Typical Pore Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%