2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple regression and machine learning based methods for carcass traits and saleable meat cuts prediction using non-invasive in vivo measurements in commercial lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning is applied often nowadays, and has shown to be competitive with logistic regression in previously conducted studies within the animal domain (e.g., Roush et al, 2006; Felipe et al, 2015; Alsahaf et al, 2018; Alves et al, 2019). To confirm these results with our own data, we also applied logistic regression (using h20.glm) to our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Machine learning is applied often nowadays, and has shown to be competitive with logistic regression in previously conducted studies within the animal domain (e.g., Roush et al, 2006; Felipe et al, 2015; Alsahaf et al, 2018; Alves et al, 2019). To confirm these results with our own data, we also applied logistic regression (using h20.glm) to our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine-learning techniques are able to deal with incomplete data, irrelevant input variables and are less vulnerable for assumptions concerning, for example, (co)linearity and distributions than classical regression techniques (Breiman, 2001; Friedman, 2001). Furthermore, machine-learning techniques proofed to be competitive in various studies in the animals sciences domain in which future performance was predicted using regression or machine-learning techniques (e.g., Roush et al, 2006; Felipe et al, 2015; Alsahaf et al, 2018; Alves et al, 2019). To predict future performance based on the integration of animal and environmental information, sometimes being incomplete and noisy, machine-learning techniques appear to be a valuable and suitable technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each lamb, the following body measurements (BMs) were recorded 24 h prior to slaughter. The BMs were taken as described previously by Bautista-Diaz et al [8]: (1) height at withers (HW), (2) rib depth (RD), (3) body diagonal length (BDL), (4) body length (BL), (5) pelvic girdle length (PGL), (6) rump depth (RuD), (7) rump height (RH), (8) pin bone width (PBW), (9) hook bone width (HBW), (10) abdomen width (AW), (11) girth circumference (GC), and (12) abdomen circumference (AC) ( Figure 1). Flexible fiberglass tape (Truper ® ) and large 65-cm calipers (Haglof ® ) were used to perform the measurements.…”
Section: Body Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect methods include the prediction of carcass and body composition based on parameters easily obtained [1] through ultrasound [4][5][6], computed tomography, dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), digital image analysis or body measurements [6][7][8][9]. Some of these methods, such as computerised tomography, magnetic resonance, and DEXA are limited to developed countries due to the cost of acquiring the necessary equipment and the need for specialised, professionally trained personnel; also, these methods can be time-consuming [3,[9][10][11]. Ultimately, the selected method for predicting carcass traits and body composition should be based on several factors, including the cost, ease of adoption and prediction accuracy regardless of the sex, age, or diet of animals [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation