2012
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2012.0048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple recurrence and convergence along the primes

Abstract: Abstract. Let E ⊂ Z be a set of positive upper density. Suppose that P 1 , P 2 , . . . , P k ∈ Z[X] are polynomials having zero constant terms. We show that the set E ∩ (E − P 1 (p − 1)) ∩ . . . ∩ (E − P k (p − 1)) is non-empty for some prime number p. Furthermore, we prove convergence in L 2 of polynomial multiple averages along the primes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that convergence of the averages on the right hand side follows from the next result that was proved in [24] conditional to some conjectures obtained later in [34,35] and the convergence part was also proved in [71]: Theorem 4.3. Let (X, µ, T ) be a system.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Note that convergence of the averages on the right hand side follows from the next result that was proved in [24] conditional to some conjectures obtained later in [34,35] and the convergence part was also proved in [71]: Theorem 4.3. Let (X, µ, T ) be a system.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Iterating this, we conclude in particular that H(X k H |Y H ) kH(X H |Y H ) + o A→∞ (1) for any natural numbers k, H with H − H k H H + (note that the number of iterations here is at most H + , so that the o A→∞ (1) error stays under control). From this and (29), (33) we see that…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The presence of the dilation factor p in the shifts T ph α i in (2.2) is a key feature of this principle that is not present in the classical Furstenberg correspondence principle, and is introduced via the entropy decrement argument from [37]. We remark that the existence of the limit in (2.2) can also be derived from the general convergence results for multiple ergodic averages along the primes in [14], [45], and the logarithmically averaged limit E log p≤P can then be replaced by the ordinary average E p≤P . In fact we have a useful formula for the limit; see Proposition 2.6 below.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 95%