1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(80)80022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple primary malignant tumors of the head and neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
1
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies report that SPT of the esophagus are the leading cause of treatment failure and death in patients with HNSCC. [19][20][21] In a group of patients treated at Sant Pau Hospital in Barcelona, the 15-year observed survival rate for patients with SPT was 22%, significantly lower than the 54% for patients without SPT. 19 Among them, patients with second primary esophageal cancers had the worst outcome, with a 5-year survival of 6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several studies report that SPT of the esophagus are the leading cause of treatment failure and death in patients with HNSCC. [19][20][21] In a group of patients treated at Sant Pau Hospital in Barcelona, the 15-year observed survival rate for patients with SPT was 22%, significantly lower than the 54% for patients without SPT. 19 Among them, patients with second primary esophageal cancers had the worst outcome, with a 5-year survival of 6%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The presence of more than one primary carcinoma has a profound influence on survival, and therefore management. Cohn and Peppard (1980) found that 75 per cent of patients who developed second primary tumours in the upper aerodigestive tract died within 12 months of the second diagnosis. Gluckman and Crissman (1983) found that overall five-year survival after diagnoisis of a second primary was 22.3 per cent (compared with 35 per cent for a control group with single lesions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this overall theory, recent investigations examining the molecular basis of SPTs claim that at least a proportion of these originate from a single contiguous pre-malignant epithelial field, the so called second field tumours [11,12]. Studies differ widely (2-30%) in their estimated risk of SPT development in part due to inconsistencies in patient selection or diagnostic criteria as well as generally inadequate follow up ( [3][4][5][6]8,10,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. It is generally accepted that diagnosis of the index tumour in concert with the premise of field cancerisation imparts a subsequent permanent risk of developing SPT [2][3][4][5][6]20,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%