2017
DOI: 10.1093/botlinnean/box062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Pleistocene refugia in the Brazilian cerrado: evidence from phylogeography and climatic nichemodelling of two Qualea species (Vochysiaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
9
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is corroborated by palynological evidence that draws into question any recent large savanna expansions that might have served as connections between the CC and AS (Colinvaux, Oliveira, Moreno, Miller, & Bush, ; Colinvaux et al., ; Kastner & Goni, ; Mayle et al., ). The only exception is the admixture detected in one south‐western Amazon population (see Figure ), which is a region where joint analyses of ENMs and cpDNA data in an unrelated plant also found evidence of a connection to the CC (see Buzatti et al., ; note this study focused only on this single site so it is not possible to determine if other AS populations in the species remained isolated from the CC).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is corroborated by palynological evidence that draws into question any recent large savanna expansions that might have served as connections between the CC and AS (Colinvaux, Oliveira, Moreno, Miller, & Bush, ; Colinvaux et al., ; Kastner & Goni, ; Mayle et al., ). The only exception is the admixture detected in one south‐western Amazon population (see Figure ), which is a region where joint analyses of ENMs and cpDNA data in an unrelated plant also found evidence of a connection to the CC (see Buzatti et al., ; note this study focused only on this single site so it is not possible to determine if other AS populations in the species remained isolated from the CC).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The genomic distinctiveness of the CC populations from the disjunct AS and lack of any regional structure that group populations from the two regions indicate the Amazonian populations have evolved independently (for the most part) from the Cerrado. As such, it is isolation and not recent connections (either via long‐distance dispersal or expansion/retraction via corridors) that dominates in this tropical biome; substantial admixture was limited to a single population that borders the Cerrado (see also Buzatti, Lemos, Bueno, & Lovato, for localized study of another plant species from this focal area). The extent to which these results are generalizable to other taxa from the Cerrado and Amazonian savannas is discussed below, as is what our results suggest about the evolutionary dynamics of relictual populations in tropical systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, core regions of the Cerrado harbour species with more restricted niches and distributions, often showing some level of habitat specialization (e.g., thick bark, deep root systems and sclerophylly) and mostly associated exclusively with savanna environments. The observed correlation between endemism and centrality of distribution might also be affected by the interaction of centrality with two other predictors tested in this work: the historical climatic suitability of nuclear regions for plants of the Cerrado (Bueno et al, ; Buzatti et al, ; Collevatti et al, ; Correa Ribeiro et al, ; Costa et al, ; Lima et al, ); and the concentration of higher‐elevation regions in core regions (e.g., Werneck, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In addition to the geomorphological processes during the Late Miocene, the Pleistocene climate is proposed as a key driver of taxa diversification in the Cerrado (Arruda, Schaefer, Fonseca, Solar, & Fernandes‐Filho, ; Bueno et al, ; Costa et al, ; Santos, Nogueira, Giugliano, & Colli, ; Werneck, Nogueira, Colli, Sites, & Costa, ). In general, climatically stable regions are considered to be good predictors of diversity at both interspecific (Jansson, ; Werneck, ) and intraspecific levels (Buzatti, Lemos‐Filho, Bueno, & Lovato, ; Carnaval & Moritz, ; Carnaval, Hickerson, Haddad, Rodrigues, & Moritz, ; Collevatti et al, ; Correa Ribeiro, Lemos‐Filho, de Oliveira Buzatti, Lovato, & Heuertz, ; Lima, Telles, Chaves, Lima‐Ribeiro, & Collevatti, ). Areas presenting less stable climatic conditions are more prone to local extinction than regions with more stable climates owing to the reduced population sizes and, consequently, greater importance of genetic drift and inbreeding (Harrison & Noss, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation