2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-phase train trajectory optimization with signalling and operational constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the instances with parameter values corresponding to the more accurate models the computations times for the MILP approach were above a minute, while the fastest Pseudospectral method took more than several minutes. P. Wang and Goverde (2016) considered the train trajectory optimization problem for two successive trains without regenerative braking with consideration of general infrastructure (varying gradients and speed limits) and operational constraints, as well as signalling constraints. Operational constraints refer to time and speed restrictions from the actual timetable, while signalling constraints refer to the influences of signal aspects and automatic train protection on train operation.…”
Section: Eett Without Regenerative Brakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the instances with parameter values corresponding to the more accurate models the computations times for the MILP approach were above a minute, while the fastest Pseudospectral method took more than several minutes. P. Wang and Goverde (2016) considered the train trajectory optimization problem for two successive trains without regenerative braking with consideration of general infrastructure (varying gradients and speed limits) and operational constraints, as well as signalling constraints. Operational constraints refer to time and speed restrictions from the actual timetable, while signalling constraints refer to the influences of signal aspects and automatic train protection on train operation.…”
Section: Eett Without Regenerative Brakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOC bt denotes the remaining capacity of the BTs, which is changed with the output/input current i bt . The law of change is portrayed by Equation (15), and the position is chosen as the independent variable to be consistent with tram movement model. Generally, SOC bt should be limited to a range, and the current output/input should not exceed its given boundary.…”
Section: On-board Hybrid Power Plant Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as equation (43) hp-adaptive pseudospectral method Pseudospectral methods for solving multiple phases train trajectory optimal control problems have been presented in [8,15]. The optimal control problem is transcribed to a discrete nonlinear programming problem at collocation points [35].…”
Section: Multiple Phases Integrated Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a consensus that a well-designed train control strategy could significantly reduce the energy consumption during the train run. such as dynamic programming method (Effati and Roohparvar, 2006;Franke et al, 2000;Ko et al, 2004;Vasak et al, 2009), linear programming method (Effati and Roohparvar, 2006;Wang et al, 2013Wang et al, , 2014 and pseudospectral method (Wang and Goverde, 2016;Wang et al, 2013Wang et al, , 2014. There are also numerical methods that don't belong to the above-mentioned types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding this issue, attempts have been made in Yang et al (2012) and Goodwin et al (2016), where the railway is operated under the fixed-block systems, and the solution is obtained by the genetic algorithm. Wang and Goverde (2016) considered the control of an individual train to minimise energy consumption and delay, while the train trajectory is restricted by the time/speed windows at specific locations of the track. A special case of this combined scheduling and control problem is to design the energy-efficient timetable in a metro line, as in Gupta et al (2016), Lo (2014a, 2014b), Su et al (2013), Xu et al (2016), Yang et al 3 It was confirmed in Albrecht et al (2016) that the energy consumption on level track is a strictly decreasing and strictly convex function of journey time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%