2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-phase enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) method for soil improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amongst the heavy metal contamination remediation measures, enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) is an environmentally friendly, efficient, and sustainable measure. Recently, the EICP technology has been widely applied to calcareous sand reinforcement ( Ahenkorah et al, 2021b ; Chen et al, 2021 ; Cui et al, 2021 ; and Meng et al, 2021 ), while studies on the remediation of contaminations, including organic and inorganic contaminants using the EICP technology, are remarkably limited ( Neupane et al, 2013 ; Putra et al, 2016 ; and Moghal et al, 2020a ). During the EICP process, urease catalyzes urea hydrolysis toward producing CO 3 2− .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst the heavy metal contamination remediation measures, enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) is an environmentally friendly, efficient, and sustainable measure. Recently, the EICP technology has been widely applied to calcareous sand reinforcement ( Ahenkorah et al, 2021b ; Chen et al, 2021 ; Cui et al, 2021 ; and Meng et al, 2021 ), while studies on the remediation of contaminations, including organic and inorganic contaminants using the EICP technology, are remarkably limited ( Neupane et al, 2013 ; Putra et al, 2016 ; and Moghal et al, 2020a ). During the EICP process, urease catalyzes urea hydrolysis toward producing CO 3 2− .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study showed that the required precipitation for dust control (70%) of sand is less than 15 g CaCO 3 /m 2 between sand grains in bio-treated sand. Meng et al ( 2021a , b ) used MICP technology to control the wind erosion of surface desert soil. The optimal cementation solution (containing equimolar urea and calcium chloride) concentration and spraying volume were 0.2 M and 4 L/m 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Environmental Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the MICP technology has been utilized to prevent liquefication of sandy soil, manage the leakage of containers, repair cracks in structures, mitigate seashore erosion, slope failure and heavy metal contamination, etc. (Chu et al 2013 ; Liu et al 2020a ; Tang et al 2020b ; Meng et al 2021a , b ). Compared with traditional engineering technologies, like compaction by rollers or densification by vibroflotation, the MICP technology has less physical impact on the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When saturated by adsorption, the change of urease activity in leachate tended to be gentle. Urease could not be stored at room temperature for a long time, and the urease activity of the whole solution would decrease after 40 h (Meng et al, 2021). At this point, the effect of fiber adsorption is no longer significant.…”
Section: Solution Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%