AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-0990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-objective Optimization of a Subsonic Small-scale Cavity-stabilized Combustor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies [2][3][4][5] have used Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) based CFD simulations combined with the Design of Experiments (DOE) algorithms to improve combustor performance by varying geometric and operational design variables. Automated CFD design study workflow presented by Briones 6 , et al and Thomas 7 , et al is used for the design space exploration and optimization of a gas turbine combustor. They use DOE algorithms along with adaptive multi-objective optimization algorithms for exploring the design space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [2][3][4][5] have used Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) based CFD simulations combined with the Design of Experiments (DOE) algorithms to improve combustor performance by varying geometric and operational design variables. Automated CFD design study workflow presented by Briones 6 , et al and Thomas 7 , et al is used for the design space exploration and optimization of a gas turbine combustor. They use DOE algorithms along with adaptive multi-objective optimization algorithms for exploring the design space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laranci et al [11] also employed 3D RANS simulations in their optimization of exit temperature and NOx but within a simpler two variable, full factorial, DoE approach instead of a formal optimization. Recently Briones et al [12] and Thomas et al [13] both optimized combustors considering the exit temperature profile and pressure losses using 3D RANS simulations, with 9 and 15 geometry parameters respectively, but did not consider emissions reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%