2010
DOI: 10.1021/ie100093c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Model Predictive Control Strategy for Disturbance Rejection

Abstract: Classical model-based control strategies assume a single disturbance model. In practice, the type of disturbance is often unknown or can change with time or multiple different disturbance types can occur simultaneously. In this paper, a multiple model predictive control strategy is developed to handle different disturbances, including multiple disturbances occurring simultaneously. A detailed discussion of disturbance model bank generation, state estimation, and disturbance model weighting is provided, and an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the RPSA device to not only produce a wide range of O 2 purities, but also a range of product flow rates. Approaches to switching models based on the disturbance have been reported in References 14,32. While our model switching does not explicitly depend on the disturbance, it does share similarities to these previous formulations in being able to switch the model in real‐time in presence of system transitions.…”
Section: Controller Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This allows the RPSA device to not only produce a wide range of O 2 purities, but also a range of product flow rates. Approaches to switching models based on the disturbance have been reported in References 14,32. While our model switching does not explicitly depend on the disturbance, it does share similarities to these previous formulations in being able to switch the model in real‐time in presence of system transitions.…”
Section: Controller Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This prevents models from becoming inactive, since the recursive nature of the probability calculation means that if a model probability decreases to zero, then it cannot be nonzero in future time steps. 17 If innovation covariance information S i, k is not available due to the choice of estimator (e.g., MHE), an alternate option for calculating model probabilities is to use the following equation for model likelihood: 17…”
Section: Augmented Model Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to use augmented models with MM methods to obtain updated parameter estimates, which provide diagnostic information . MM methods offer the advantage of low computational cost while still providing diagnostic information; however, there are only limited examples of their use in chemical systems. , Furthermore, these works focus on unbiased output estimation and control, which does not necessarily guarantee unbiased state estimation. The design of an appropriate model set to use with MM methods is also challenging, because there needs to be enough separation between models based on output residuals and enough models to capture the range of system dynamics; however, using too many models will decrease performance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gap metric was introduced, which is the distance between the linear approximation of the nonlinear system and another linear system. Applications of this metric for nonlinearity estimation and multimodel control have been studied , via weight-based control, the H∞ loop-shaping technique, stability margin , and integration with the neighborhood estimation algorithm . However, linearization may lose an important part of the nonlinearity which is detrimental for the appropriate nonlinearity measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%