2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002620000154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple mechanisms of immune evasion can coexist in melanoma tumor cell lines derived from the same patient

Abstract: Progressive tumor growth may be associated with suppression of the immune response. Many different mechanisms may contribute to immune evasion. We investigated some of these mechanisms in melanoma cells lines generated from two patients. These cell lines show a complex pattern of altered HLA expression; however, the resulting phenotype did not satisfactorily explain the simultaneous evasion of T and NK cell cytotoxicity. Two additional alterations have now been detected in these melanoma cell lines: (1) resist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation is that the tumour microenvironment is so immunosuppressive that any incoming effector cell is impeded (Appay et al, 2006). Proposed mechanisms for melanoma-derived immunosuppression include the secretion of TGFb, IL-10 and IDO, which have been found in patients' blood, primary melanomas and sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) (Reed et al, 1994;Real et al, 2001;Lee et al, 2003Lee et al, , 2005Redondo et al, 2003). Additionally, levels were found to correlate with tumour progression and invasiveness (Reed et al, 1994;Conrad et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation is that the tumour microenvironment is so immunosuppressive that any incoming effector cell is impeded (Appay et al, 2006). Proposed mechanisms for melanoma-derived immunosuppression include the secretion of TGFb, IL-10 and IDO, which have been found in patients' blood, primary melanomas and sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) (Reed et al, 1994;Real et al, 2001;Lee et al, 2003Lee et al, , 2005Redondo et al, 2003). Additionally, levels were found to correlate with tumour progression and invasiveness (Reed et al, 1994;Conrad et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the principal mechanism of tumor escape is the loss, down-regulation or alteration of HLA profiles that may render the target cell unresponsive to CTL lysis, even if the cell expresses the appropriate tumor antigen. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Thus, in both situations, low frequency of a particular tumorassociated MHC-peptide complex, or downregulation of MHC expression on tumor cells, antibody-guided, tumor-specific targeting of class I MHC-peptide complexes onto tumor cells, as shown herein, can be an effective and efficient strategy to render cells more susceptible to lysis by the relevant, preselected, desirable HLA-A2-restricted CTLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Even when a specific CTL response is demonstrated in patients, this response is low because the antitumor CTL population is rare, very infrequent and in some cases not functional or anergic. 42 Moreover, it is wellestablished that the number of MHC-peptide complexes on the surface of tumor cells that present a particular tumor-associated peptide is low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanisms that may exist for the escape of tumors from immunosurveillance are of course not mutually exclusive but rather a combination of several different characteristics ( Figure) (Real et al, 2001): failure to express the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigen; decreased and heterogeneous expression of tumor antigen (TA); and abnormal expression of accessory molecules by tumor cells. In addition to these, many other factors allow tumor cells to escape immunosurveillance.…”
Section: Escape Mechanisms In Tumor Immunosurveillancementioning
confidence: 99%