2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423107112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple mechanisms limit meiotic crossovers: TOP3α and two BLM homologs antagonize crossovers in parallel to FANCM

Abstract: Meiotic crossovers (COs) have two important roles, shuffling genetic information and ensuring proper chromosome segregation. Despite their importance and a large excess of precursors (i.e., DNA doublestrand breaks, DSBs), the number of COs is tightly regulated, typically one to three per chromosome pair. The mechanisms ensuring that most DSBs are repaired as non-COs and the evolutionary forces imposing this constraint are poorly understood. Here we identified Topoisomerase3α (TOP3α) and the RECQ4 helicases-the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
253
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
12
253
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonoverlapping DNA repair roles between Mph1 and either Sgs1 or Srs2 lead to synthetic sickness or lethality of double mutants upon DNA damage occurrence (St Onge et al 2007;Chen et al 2009;Panico et al 2010). Similarly, Mph1 and STR orthologs in fission yeast and A. thaliana also have independent functions in crossover control and/or DNA repair (Sun et al 2008;Knoll et al 2012;Seguela-Arnaud et al 2015). In D. melanogaster, FANCM and BTR appear to be epistatic for crossover control but additive for DNA repair (Kuo et al 2014).…”
Section: Fancm Regulation By Faap24 and Kinasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonoverlapping DNA repair roles between Mph1 and either Sgs1 or Srs2 lead to synthetic sickness or lethality of double mutants upon DNA damage occurrence (St Onge et al 2007;Chen et al 2009;Panico et al 2010). Similarly, Mph1 and STR orthologs in fission yeast and A. thaliana also have independent functions in crossover control and/or DNA repair (Sun et al 2008;Knoll et al 2012;Seguela-Arnaud et al 2015). In D. melanogaster, FANCM and BTR appear to be epistatic for crossover control but additive for DNA repair (Kuo et al 2014).…”
Section: Fancm Regulation By Faap24 and Kinasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, RECQ4B does not play a detectable role in somatic DNA repair. However, both RECQ4A and RECQ4B helicases have anticrossover activity in meiosis, with their simultaneous depletion inducing a 6-fold increase in CO frequency (Séguéla-Arnaud et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FANCM helicase acts with MHF1 and MHF2 to promote formation of noncrossovers, in the absence of which most strand invasion events enter a noninterfering crossover repair pathway (Crismani et al 2012;Knoll et al 2012;Girard et al 2014). FIDGITIN, RECQ4A, RECQ4B, and TOPOISOMERASE3α have been identified as additional anti-crossover factors in Arabidopsis (Girard et al 2015;Séguéla-Arnaud et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%