2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1201.5277
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple M5-branes, String 2-connections, and 7d nonabelian Chern-Simons theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we have only discussed abelian gauge fields here, their appearance (by the construction in §5, §7) via the M2/M5 super-cocycle µ M2/M5 (2) means that the super-cohomotopical gauge enhancement mechanism found in [BSS18] applies. Together with the constraints of half-integral flux quantization and tadpole cancellation, which we demonstrate in [FSS19b] and [SS19], respectively, to follow from C-field charge quantization in full Cohomotopy (114), this should generate the expected types of nonabelian gauge fields, both for heterotic M-theory as well as for coincident 5-branes, in the form discussed in [Sat10a][Sat10b][FSS12a] [FSS12b]. While the details remain to be worked out, this opens up the possibility of a concrete strategy for systematically deriving the non-abelian D=6 M5-brane theory from first principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…While we have only discussed abelian gauge fields here, their appearance (by the construction in §5, §7) via the M2/M5 super-cocycle µ M2/M5 (2) means that the super-cohomotopical gauge enhancement mechanism found in [BSS18] applies. Together with the constraints of half-integral flux quantization and tadpole cancellation, which we demonstrate in [FSS19b] and [SS19], respectively, to follow from C-field charge quantization in full Cohomotopy (114), this should generate the expected types of nonabelian gauge fields, both for heterotic M-theory as well as for coincident 5-branes, in the form discussed in [Sat10a][Sat10b][FSS12a] [FSS12b]. While the details remain to be worked out, this opens up the possibility of a concrete strategy for systematically deriving the non-abelian D=6 M5-brane theory from first principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…✷ As we saw above, these obstructions mostly vanish for dimension reasons in our range of dimensions. However, we will consider bundles other than the tangent bundle; for example bundles with structure group SO(32) rather than SO (10) or SO (11).…”
Section: Bo 10 and Bo 11 Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In algebraic topology, String structures play a role of orientation for elliptic cohomology [1] [34] [35]. In differential geometry, String connections play a role in geometrically describing bundles with the String group as a structure group [31] [26] [39] [6] [7]. In mathematical physics, conditions for having String structures arise as anomaly cancellation conditions [16] [30] [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then many models of the String group have appeared, each having different desirable features (see e.g. the appendix of [7] for seven such models). For instance, in one model [23], String(n) is constructed as an extension as in eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%