Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 1960
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0537-9_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-Layer Insulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in heat flow for 10-15 liter vessels was 30-35% under the same conditions. This "thermal paradox" has also been observed by other authors [2][3][4][5] in various types of insulation.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The decrease in heat flow for 10-15 liter vessels was 30-35% under the same conditions. This "thermal paradox" has also been observed by other authors [2][3][4][5] in various types of insulation.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The results of much of this work are summarized in published literature•which describes the state of multilayer super-insulation systems during that period. 3…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the cylindrical calorimeter [5], that shown in Fig. 1 eliminates edge effects, and the insulation-laying and evacuation conditions are similar to those encountered in practice in connection with small vessels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in calorimetric measurements certain authors have observed an increase in Xeff with increase in the thickness of the investigated specimen. This effect is either simply noted without explanation [4] or attributed to a possible experimental error [5], since in flat and cylindrical calorimeters it is very difficult to eliminate the error due to edge effects, especially when the thickness of the specimen is increased. Indeed, if at a pressure in the calorimeter cavity of less than 1 9 10 -3 N/m 2 the heat transfer through a specimen of multilayer vacuum insulation is regarded only as heat transport by radiation and solid conduction, with heat transport by the residual gases neglected, it is impossible to explain the dependence of keff on 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%