2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12132-012-9163-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Land Regimes: Rethinking Land Governance in Maputo’s Peri-urban Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These in turn have specifi c historical roots, and the diverse and even confl icting interests militate against efforts at coherence or even alternative, bottom-up and more sustainable planning than what has resulted from the failed modernist legacy. Yet, in peri-urban Maputo, where the state still technically owns all land, fragmentation is also occurring although technically illegal informal markets appear to operate quite effi ciently (Kihato et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These in turn have specifi c historical roots, and the diverse and even confl icting interests militate against efforts at coherence or even alternative, bottom-up and more sustainable planning than what has resulted from the failed modernist legacy. Yet, in peri-urban Maputo, where the state still technically owns all land, fragmentation is also occurring although technically illegal informal markets appear to operate quite effi ciently (Kihato et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban land governance in Mozambique has historically evolved amidst the contradictions and gaps of successive state regimes [28][29][30][31]. This has given rise to a set of institutional practices which bear little relationship to formal bureaucratic laws and regulations [32][33][34]. This is not a simple story of formality vs. informality however, as these practices are underpinned and regulated by lower levels of the formal municipality bureaucracy.…”
Section: Urban Land Governance In Beiramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of overseeing land transactions and providing such affidavits is regularly associated with the payment fees to local leaders and the neighborhood secretary, which creates a financial incentive among benefactors for continued (illegal) land transactions. It is nonetheless a system which has been credited with providing a high degree of tenure security [31,33,34] From the perspective of 'formality' the land claims established through 'alternative formality' are based on illegal transactions which are, at best, eligible for usufruct rights after 10 years if in compliance with urban plans developed by the municipality. In the face of urban 'development' however, all tenure is fundamentally insecure as the state is vested with the ability to expropriate land if deemed to be in the public interest.…”
Section: Urban Land Governance In Beiramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, urban governance and development are greatly influenced by local actors in a given jurisdiction (c.f. Stigt et al (2013), Rakodi (2003) and Kihato et al (2013)): they deal directly with local interests including informalities, disputes, land transactions, and land allocations. Arguably, a multi-level urban land governance framework is argued to fill the gap.…”
Section: Multi-level Urban Land Governancementioning
confidence: 99%