2004
DOI: 10.1081/sei-120039636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Ion Exchange Column Tests for Technetium Removal from Hanford Site Tank 241‐AW‐101 with Superlig®639 Resin

Abstract: Five cycles of loading, elution, and regeneration were performed to remove technetium from a Hanford waste sample retrieved from Tank 241-AW-101 using SuperLig ® 639 resin. The waste sample was diluted to 4.95 M Na + and then was processed to remove 137 Cs through dual ion exchange columns each containing 15 mL of SuperLig ® 644. To remove 99 Tc, the cesium decontaminated solution was processed downwards through two ion exchange columns, each containing 12 mL of SuperLig ® 639 resin. The columns, designated as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many of these resins have been shown to be effective at pertechnetate removal from high sodium nitrate and nitrite solutions, SuperLig® 639 is the most studied of the successful resins with actual Hanford tank supernatants (Robbins and McCabe 2013) and therefore is the recommended material for this testing. From existing test results (for example AW-101 testing), well over 40 bed volumes of supernatant can be passed through a SuperLig® 639 column before significant breakthrough of pertechnetate is observed (Hassan et al 2003).…”
Section: Approach/discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many of these resins have been shown to be effective at pertechnetate removal from high sodium nitrate and nitrite solutions, SuperLig® 639 is the most studied of the successful resins with actual Hanford tank supernatants (Robbins and McCabe 2013) and therefore is the recommended material for this testing. From existing test results (for example AW-101 testing), well over 40 bed volumes of supernatant can be passed through a SuperLig® 639 column before significant breakthrough of pertechnetate is observed (Hassan et al 2003).…”
Section: Approach/discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10] Besides, deep removal of hazardous and radioactive TcO4 -(ReO4 -is used as its structural surrogate) is of particular importance in nuclear waste management to avoid potential enviorenment pollutants. [11][12] These provide an incentive to develop new strategies that might allow low-content (at the ppm level) rhenium to be effectively and selectively isolated from rhenium-bearing resources, such as the leaching liquors of natural rhenium mineral and rhenium-containing spent wastes, in which ReO4 -is expected to be the dominant rhenium form. 3,13 In this regard, both solid-liquid extraction (SLE) and liquidliquid extraction (LLE) strategies are appealing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this assumption, in the 1990s, separation of Tc through ion exchange was part of the Hanford tank waste pretreatment flowsheet . However, while effective separation of Tc (as TcO 4 – ) from the simulated solutions and some Hanford wastes could be achieved, the method failed for waste samples containing high concentrations of organics, with only a fraction of the total soluble Tc being separated. This unexpected Tc behavior was found to persist for several different tank waste samples. Further, in control experiments where 95m/99m TcO 4 – was added to the tank waste samples containing native 99 Tc and passed through TcO 4 – -selective resins such as Reillex HPQ, ABEC, or SuperLig 639 to test retention, the spiked samples exhibited expected 95m/99m TcO 4 – retention unlike the native samples. ,,, A plausible explanation is the existence of tank waste Tc as low-valent forms in addition to TcO 4 – .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%