1996
DOI: 10.1677/jme.0.0170089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple intracellular effectors modulate physiological functions of the cloned somatostatin receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The localization of SSTR-1 in endothelial cells is consistent with the finding that removal of endothelial cells abolished the vascular effect of somatostatin (31,32). All five receptors are coupled to G-proteins and affect a number of distinct signal transduction pathways (33,34). All five receptors are also functionally coupled to inhibition of adenyl cyclase (35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The localization of SSTR-1 in endothelial cells is consistent with the finding that removal of endothelial cells abolished the vascular effect of somatostatin (31,32). All five receptors are coupled to G-proteins and affect a number of distinct signal transduction pathways (33,34). All five receptors are also functionally coupled to inhibition of adenyl cyclase (35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…35 S]GTPgS binding, MAP kinase activation and tyrosine phosphatase activity to name but a few (Florio & Schettini, 1996;Patel, 1999). However, discrepancies often occur between the effects of SRIF ligands at a given receptor subtype, depending on the cell line, binding test, or second messenger studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data indicate that SDF1 activity requires the activation of a G-protein of the Gi/Go subfamily, and that its effects are responsive to inhibitory stimuli as observed in both normal pituitary and secreting adenomas. Interestingly, pertussis toxin was able to abolish both the stimulatory effects of SDF1 (Florio et al 2006) and the inhibitory effects of somatostatin (Florio & Schettini 1996). SDF1 was also a powerful mitogen for GH4C1 cells, with a statistically significant effect already evident at a concentration of 6 .…”
Section: Biological Effects Of Sdf1 In Pituitary Adenoma Cells: the Gmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The observation that pertussis toxin reversed both the stimulatory effects of SDF1 and the inhibitory action of somatostatin, depends on the observation that CXCR4 and all the somatostatin receptors are coupled to a pertussis toxinsensitive G-protein. However, the opposite biological effects observed can be understood by the different intracellular signaling activated by the respective receptors (for review see Schettini 1996 andBajetto et al 2001a). For example, an opposite regulation of ERK1/2 activity was reported for CXCR4 (activation; Bajetto et al 2001b) and the somatostatin receptors (inhibition; Massa et al 2004).…”
Section: Biological Effects Of Sdf1 In Pituitary Adenoma Cells: the Gmentioning
confidence: 99%