2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.917947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple instance learning for landmine detection using ground penetrating radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, during classifier development and execution, other ad hoc techniques to aggregate decision metrics from sets of images are required (e.g., average the top three confidences as in Section IV-B). This process is necessary because the underlying problem being solved is not a simple pattern recognition problem but can instead be well represented as a multiple-instance learning (MIL) problem (e.g., [39], [40], [44]- [46]). Treating the learning problem in GPR as an MIL problem is a young but active area of research that is currently being explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, during classifier development and execution, other ad hoc techniques to aggregate decision metrics from sets of images are required (e.g., average the top three confidences as in Section IV-B). This process is necessary because the underlying problem being solved is not a simple pattern recognition problem but can instead be well represented as a multiple-instance learning (MIL) problem (e.g., [39], [40], [44]- [46]). Treating the learning problem in GPR as an MIL problem is a young but active area of research that is currently being explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with many GPR-processing applications, both the training and testing procedures used here are beset by logistical problems necessitating ad hoc solutions, e.g., the selection of positive examples with smoothed energy, and aggregating over classifier confidences using order statistics. In actuality these problems can be seen as symptoms of the underlying multipleinstance nature of the target identification problem [39], [40]; see Section VI for further discussion.…”
Section: B Temporal Locations For Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [140,141], MIL classifiers detect buried landmines from ground-penetrating radar signals. When a detection occurs at a given GPS coordinate, measures are taken at various depths in the soil.…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has previously been applied to landmine data using Edge Histogram Descriptors (EHD) features at different depths. 12 The problem with MIL in this application is that the constraints of the model break down as the size of the image region decreases. With small image regions, which are desirable in order to identify the specific parts of a landmine response, the assumptions for MIL no longer hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%