2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple instance learning for histopathological breast cancer image classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
196
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
196
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital Pathology has grown considerably in recent years encompassing computerbased activities that allow for improvements and innovations in the workflow of pathology [1]. In this domain the automated processing of tissue samples has received increasing attention due to the potential applications in diagnosis [2], grading [3], identification of tissue substructures [4], prognostication and mutation prediction [5]. A number of problems, however, still limit the adoption of digital pathology on a large scale: the relatively scarce availability of large labelled datasets of histological images, the differences in the acquisition systems and/or protocol used as well as the variability in tissue preparation and/or stain reactivity [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital Pathology has grown considerably in recent years encompassing computerbased activities that allow for improvements and innovations in the workflow of pathology [1]. In this domain the automated processing of tissue samples has received increasing attention due to the potential applications in diagnosis [2], grading [3], identification of tissue substructures [4], prognostication and mutation prediction [5]. A number of problems, however, still limit the adoption of digital pathology on a large scale: the relatively scarce availability of large labelled datasets of histological images, the differences in the acquisition systems and/or protocol used as well as the variability in tissue preparation and/or stain reactivity [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, this problem can be seen as a multiple instance learning (MIL) problem [25] and that a MILbased approach can be a promising path for future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, we achieved 85.1% of accuracy using the TCNN without data augmentation, a performance comparable to the baseline which employs an AlexNet CNN with millions of trainable parameters. Approach Accuracy (%) CNN (Alexnet) [7] 84.6 TCNN (DA 1×) 85.1 Baseline [4] 85.1 TCNN Inc (DA 72×) 85.7 Deep Features (DeCaf) [12] 86.3 CNN+Fisher [13] 86.9 MI Approach [11] 87.2 Inception V3 FT (DA 72×) 87.4…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%