Multiple Incentives for Parental Optimism and Brood Reduction in Blackbirds

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology. Abstract. Why do parent birds hatch their young asynchronously? This phenotypic handicap exacts a cost of reduced growth and elevated mortality from the last-hatched or "marginal" offspring, while conferring advantages to the more senior "core" brood. David Lack long ago proposed that marginal offspring allow parents to track resources that are uncertain at the time of clutch initiation. If food is insufficient for the entire brood, hatching asynchrony allows surplus marginal offspring to be culled from the brood efficiently. This in effect represents a secondary adjustment of clutch size. Today Lack's hypothesis remains a central, although controversial, component, of discussions of hatching asynchrony and avian brood reduction. Most field workers report results inconsistent with Lack's hypothesis (e.g., a failure of asynchronously hatching broods to produce more fledglings than do experimentally synchronized broods) and have offered a variety of alternative explanations.Previous workers have focused, with limited success, on single explanations for the complex phenomena of hatching asynchrony. Here we use parental optimism theory to study the secondary adjustment of clutch size in an integrated framework emphasizing ecological (tracking uncertain resources) and developmental (unpredictable survival, quality and/or sex of progeny) uncertainty. We present the results of a 6-yr study of Yellow-headed Blackbirds (Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus), a marsh-nesting icterid. Marginal offspring that are the products of hatching asynchrony serve multiple functions simultaneously: in tracking resources that vary temporally; as a hedge against hatching failure; and in progeny choice via sex-biased brood reduction. The effect of the phenotypic handicap was diminished both by improving ecological conditions and by hatching failure/experimental clutch reduction. Marginal offspring represent high variance progeny, and synchrony represents a high variance strategy. Brood reduction occurred at low cost and was rendered more efficient by hatching asynchrony, particularly under conditions of stringency.survival advantages over last-hatched nestmates (Mock 1984, Magrath 1990), provides a striking example. The obvious question is why? Explanations for avian hatching asynchrony fall into three categories: (1) asynchrony is directly adaptive; e.g., by allowing tracking of uncertain resources (reviewed in Pijanowski 1992); (2) asynchrony arises as a sequela to other adaptive trade-offs; e.g., avoidance of whole-brood loss (Hussell 1972, Clark and Wilson 1981); or (3) asynchrony is an unselected b...

Contributions of marginal offspring to reproductive success of Nazca booby (Sula granti) parents: tests of multiple hypotheses

“…Ideally, the assumption that marginal offspring provide RV e should be tested before experiments are conducted to test the resource-tracking hypothesis. In an excellent example of this kind of decomposition, Forbes et al (2002) showed that marginal offspring of yellow-headed blackbirds (Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus) provide a mix of benefits: extra offspring via resource tracking in years of food abundance, an insurance benefit via replacement of core eggs that fail to hatch, and a progeny choice benefit via excess mortality of costly sons during food shortages. They also showed that the magnitude of these different contributions varies across years.…”

Food Regulates Reproduction Differently in Different Habitats: Experimental Evidence in the Goshawk

“…In addition to treatment (fed, unfed), territory type (forest territory, bog territory) and the absence-presence of failing eggs (0, no unhatched eggs; 1, at least one unhatched egg) were included as explanatory variables in this model. This was done because hatching failure may increase the survival of offspring that might have died if all eggs had hatched (e.g., Forbes et al 2002). Because broods with one nestling naturally cannot be partially reduced, clutches in which only one egg hatched (n ¼ 4) were excluded from the analyses of these data.…”

The Role of Immigration in the Decline of an Isolated Migratory Bird Population

“…Once located, nests were monitored once a week until they either failed or fledged young. I compared the number of young fledged per nest attempt and per successful nest (nests that fledged at least one nestling) with data from other Yellow-headed Blackbird populations in Washington ( Willson 1966;Patterson et al 1980;Beletsky & Orians 1994), Manitoba (Lightbody 1986;Forbes et al 2002), Iowa (Ammann 1938;Richter 1984), and Wisconsin (Minock 1985).…”