2007
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple imputation: review of theory, implementation and software

Abstract: SUMMARYMissing data is a common complication in data analysis. In many medical settings missing data can cause difficulties in estimation, precision and inference. Multiple imputation (MI) [1] is a simulation based approach to deal with incomplete data. Although there are many different methods to deal with incomplete data, MI has become one of the leading methods. Since the late 80's we observed a constant increase in the use and publication of MI related research. This tutorial does not attempt to cover all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
274
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(70 reference statements)
3
274
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Imputation was performed separately on the derivation cohort and the validation cohort, with the predictor variables chosen using the same strategy [40]. Each of the imputed sets was then analyzed as if it were complete, and the results pooled by the method presented by Rubin [41] to create inferences that validly reflects sampling variability as a result of imputation. The imputation method we used is well documented and accepted [40,41].…”
Section: Development Of Predictive Models Using Data Mining Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Imputation was performed separately on the derivation cohort and the validation cohort, with the predictor variables chosen using the same strategy [40]. Each of the imputed sets was then analyzed as if it were complete, and the results pooled by the method presented by Rubin [41] to create inferences that validly reflects sampling variability as a result of imputation. The imputation method we used is well documented and accepted [40,41].…”
Section: Development Of Predictive Models Using Data Mining Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the imputed sets was then analyzed as if it were complete, and the results pooled by the method presented by Rubin [41] to create inferences that validly reflects sampling variability as a result of imputation. The imputation method we used is well documented and accepted [40,41].…”
Section: Development Of Predictive Models Using Data Mining Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple imputation (MI) (method 11) was introduced, [13], [27], [40] to take into account the uncertainty that is caused by the existence of the missing data, by creating complete data sets [12], [15], [22], [27]. Usually, a small number of sets is adequate m=3-5.…”
Section: G Multipe Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand likelihood-based approaches to doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2013.11 impute missing data are available. Among them, Multiple Imputation via Chained Equations (MICE) is established as the standard tool (14,15). In MICE, each missing datum is replaced multiple times, therefore creating more than one (typically 10) data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MICE is referred to as multiple imputation method, as it replaces each missing value with multiple plausible values (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%